Template talk:QuitCount - Revision history

Thorgnzorrg at 05:52, 29 November 2010

2010-11-29T05:52:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 29 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Is this really necessary? We've had counters for all sorts of things in the past, but all of them were prone to change on a daily basis. This is basically a static fact, and although it's interesting to know how many days he's been offline, the rest is not really necessary in a counter because it's not going to change for at almost 3 months (which would change the "longest quit attempt" thing by loloneday).		Is this really necessary? We've had counters for all sorts of things in the past, but all of them were prone to change on a daily basis. This is basically a static fact, and although it's interesting to know how many days he's been offline, the rest is not really necessary in a counter because it's not going to change for at almost 3 months (which would change the "longest quit attempt" thing by loloneday).
	tl;dr: Keep the "days offline" thing, but the rest has no place on the front page. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 15:58, 25 November 2010 (PST)		tl;dr: Keep the "days offline" thing, but the rest has no place on the front page. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 15:58, 25 November 2010 (PST)

			I don't think Chris should be given the credit of actually appearing to have quit the internet. Even saying "without appearing on the internet" would look a bit better. --[[User:Thorgnzorrg\|Thorgnzorrg]] 21:52, 28 November 2010 (PST)

Shinji at 18:00, 27 November 2010

2010-11-27T18:00:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 27 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	However, it's fun to exaggerate on CWCki (where exaggeration is not just making shit up). If anyone has a reason why we should stick to the TRUE AND HONEST quit count, feel free to say so. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)		However, it's fun to exaggerate on CWCki (where exaggeration is not just making shit up). If anyone has a reason why we should stick to the TRUE AND HONEST quit count, feel free to say so. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)
			*Hard to say if he's ever escaped from the internet's warm embrace (PSN, logging into Youtube, etc.), but I agree that it's fun to exaggerate. [[User:Shinji\|Shinji]] 10:00, 27 November 2010 (PST)

	Is this really necessary? We've had counters for all sorts of things in the past, but all of them were prone to change on a daily basis. This is basically a static fact, and although it's interesting to know how many days he's been offline, the rest is not really necessary in a counter because it's not going to change for at almost 3 months (which would change the "longest quit attempt" thing by loloneday).		Is this really necessary? We've had counters for all sorts of things in the past, but all of them were prone to change on a daily basis. This is basically a static fact, and although it's interesting to know how many days he's been offline, the rest is not really necessary in a counter because it's not going to change for at almost 3 months (which would change the "longest quit attempt" thing by loloneday).
	tl;dr: Keep the "days offline" thing, but the rest has no place on the front page. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 15:58, 25 November 2010 (PST)		tl;dr: Keep the "days offline" thing, but the rest has no place on the front page. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 15:58, 25 November 2010 (PST)

Freecell at 23:58, 25 November 2010

2010-11-25T23:58:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 25 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	However, it's fun to exaggerate on CWCki (where exaggeration is not just making shit up). If anyone has a reason why we should stick to the TRUE AND HONEST quit count, feel free to say so. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)		However, it's fun to exaggerate on CWCki (where exaggeration is not just making shit up). If anyone has a reason why we should stick to the TRUE AND HONEST quit count, feel free to say so. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 10:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)

			Is this really necessary? We've had counters for all sorts of things in the past, but all of them were prone to change on a daily basis. This is basically a static fact, and although it's interesting to know how many days he's been offline, the rest is not really necessary in a counter because it's not going to change for at almost 3 months (which would change the "longest quit attempt" thing by loloneday).
			tl;dr: Keep the "days offline" thing, but the rest has no place on the front page. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] 15:58, 25 November 2010 (PST)

Anonymax: Created page with "== Attempts to leave the internet == For the purposes of this counter, an attempt to leave the internet refers to a video where Chris announced he was leaving the internet. Techn..."

2010-11-25T18:43:41Z

Created page with "== Attempts to leave the internet == For the purposes of this counter, an attempt to leave the internet refers to a video where Chris announced he was leaving the internet. Techn..."

New page

== Attempts to leave the internet ==
For the purposes of this counter, an attempt to leave the internet refers to a video where Chris announced he was leaving the internet. Technically (as of writing this message) he has only really quit the internet about 3 times. Chris uploading a video is not necessarily him breaking his vow to quit - take [[100 2188|27 May 2010]] & [[100 2189|31 May 2010]] for example. The second video is more of a follow-up to the first - the second video is not a fresh quit attempt, but more a repeat of the announcement made in the first video.

However, it's fun to exaggerate on CWCki (where exaggeration is not just making shit up). If anyone has a reason why we should stick to the TRUE AND HONEST quit count, feel free to say so. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 10:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)