Template talk:Split Off - Revision history

Edward at 17:24, 4 April 2010

2010-04-04T17:24:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 4 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
	*Oh, and the joke for the other one is that there's that pic of Barb, hence the "too large" theme. But personally, it looks like shit compared to this one. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		*Oh, and the joke for the other one is that there's that pic of Barb, hence the "too large" theme. But personally, it looks like shit compared to this one. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			**I thought that one was just asking you to remove pointless crap in the article, and that this one would be a different kind, asking you to put irrelevant info into another article instead of outright deleting it. --[[User:Edward\|Edward]] 17:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom at 16:59, 4 April 2010

2010-04-04T16:59:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 4 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)		We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
			*Oh, and the joke for the other one is that there's that pic of Barb, hence the "too large" theme. But personally, it looks like shit compared to this one. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Champthom: Created page with 'We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or t…'

2010-04-04T16:59:07Z

Created page with 'We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or t…'

New page

We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)