User talk:DawnDusk - Revision history

NotChrisChan at 22:18, 22 February 2015

2015-02-22T22:18:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 22 February 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Don't know. Wait and see. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] 00:07, 4 January 2014 (PST)		Don't know. Wait and see. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] 00:07, 4 January 2014 (PST)

			== I FOUND YOU ==

			Well you think it's cool to call a black guy a nigger??? I never! [[User:NotChrisChan\|I AM NOT CHRIS]] 22:18, 2 February 2015 (PST)

Alan Pardew: /* Re: IP */ new section

2014-01-04T08:07:35Z

Re: IP: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, 4 January 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:

	We were discussing it on IRC at the time. Basically we decided to let it play for a few hours, to see if there was any logic or reasoning behind the "overwriting" of the photos. If it happens again, IRC is probably the best place to be. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 07:16, 11 November 2011 (PST)		We were discussing it on IRC at the time. Basically we decided to let it play for a few hours, to see if there was any logic or reasoning behind the "overwriting" of the photos. If it happens again, IRC is probably the best place to be. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 07:16, 11 November 2011 (PST)

			== Re: IP ==

			Don't know. Wait and see. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] 00:07, 4 January 2014 (PST)

Anonymax: /* Re: Image changes */ new section

2011-11-11T15:16:51Z

Re: Image changes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 11 November 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)		It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
	:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)		:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)

			== Re: Image changes ==

			We were discussing it on IRC at the time. Basically we decided to let it play for a few hours, to see if there was any logic or reasoning behind the "overwriting" of the photos. If it happens again, IRC is probably the best place to be. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 07:16, 11 November 2011 (PST)

Anonymax: /* He's Dead, Jim. */

2011-09-21T04:10:56Z

He's Dead, Jim.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 21 September 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)		It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
	:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)		:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)

Anonymax at 04:09, 21 September 2011

2011-09-21T04:09:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 21 September 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)		It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
			:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)

Anonymax: He's Dead, Jim.

2011-09-19T21:27:28Z

He's Dead, Jim.

New page

== He's Dead, Jim. ==

It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)