User talk:Dethchemist77 - Revision history

Champthom: /* A proposition */ new section

2011-02-08T23:31:49Z

A proposition: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 8 February 2011
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Your voice is nice and clear like LiquidPlumr! You are probably one of the best narrators on the planet (next to Morgan Freeman). -- [[User:TheIronFjord\|TheIronFjord]] 12:48, 27 January 2011 (EST)		Your voice is nice and clear like LiquidPlumr! You are probably one of the best narrators on the planet (next to Morgan Freeman). -- [[User:TheIronFjord\|TheIronFjord]] 12:48, 27 January 2011 (EST)

			== A proposition ==

			I have a unique opportunity just for you to contribute to the CWCki. If you're interested, contact me (my info is on my user page). --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 15:31, 8 February 2011 (PST)

TheIronFjord at 17:49, 27 January 2011

2011-01-27T17:49:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 27 January 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:*That would save me a lot of time, yeah. The only trick is that I'm not sure which set of templates needs to stay or go. Anonymax seems to prefer Template:Email (all the Jackie E-Mail pages use it), and I had just assumed Quotebox was the preferred template, because it had been around longer. It's not a case where Template: Email got used like three times, so it's not as cut and dried as I thought. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 11:17, 7 December 2010 (PST)		:*That would save me a lot of time, yeah. The only trick is that I'm not sure which set of templates needs to stay or go. Anonymax seems to prefer Template:Email (all the Jackie E-Mail pages use it), and I had just assumed Quotebox was the preferred template, because it had been around longer. It's not a case where Template: Email got used like three times, so it's not as cut and dried as I thought. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 11:17, 7 December 2010 (PST)


			== You are the silliest narrator ever! ==

			Your voice is nice and clear like LiquidPlumr! You are probably one of the best narrators on the planet (next to Morgan Freeman). -- [[User:TheIronFjord\|TheIronFjord]] 12:48, 27 January 2011 (EST)

Dethchemist77: Which one do we keep? Template:Email or Template:Quotebox? Does anyone have a preference?

2010-12-07T19:17:47Z

Which one do we keep? Template:Email or Template:Quotebox? Does anyone have a preference?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 7 December 2010
Line 35:		Line 35:
	== HEY READ THIS DETH PLZ ==		== HEY READ THIS DETH PLZ ==
	If you need any mass text replaced for example change {{Template:STUPID}} to {{Template:SUPERDUMB}} i can make it happen. by hijacking the admin controls. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 22:37, 6 December 2010 (PST)		If you need any mass text replaced for example change {{Template:STUPID}} to {{Template:SUPERDUMB}} i can make it happen. by hijacking the admin controls. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 22:37, 6 December 2010 (PST)

			:*That would save me a lot of time, yeah. The only trick is that I'm not sure which set of templates needs to stay or go. Anonymax seems to prefer Template:Email (all the Jackie E-Mail pages use it), and I had just assumed Quotebox was the preferred template, because it had been around longer. It's not a case where Template: Email got used like three times, so it's not as cut and dried as I thought. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 11:17, 7 December 2010 (PST)

Clydec at 06:37, 7 December 2010

2010-12-07T06:37:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 7 December 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:
	*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)		*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)
	::What I realised a while ago is that a lot of templates are pretty basic and are simple to explain - so having a giant doc box and subpage for documentation was largely unnecessary. Some templates simply don't need explaining - but adding one or two lines under a usage template could work. Would definitely like to see the documentation template phased out though, so if you are working in those realms - that would be good. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 22:44, 26 November 2010 (PST)		::What I realised a while ago is that a lot of templates are pretty basic and are simple to explain - so having a giant doc box and subpage for documentation was largely unnecessary. Some templates simply don't need explaining - but adding one or two lines under a usage template could work. Would definitely like to see the documentation template phased out though, so if you are working in those realms - that would be good. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 22:44, 26 November 2010 (PST)

			== HEY READ THIS DETH PLZ ==
			If you need any mass text replaced for example change {{Template:STUPID}} to {{Template:SUPERDUMB}} i can make it happen. by hijacking the admin controls. -- [[User:Clydec\|Clyde]] 22:37, 6 December 2010 (PST)

Anonymax: /* Documentation */

2010-11-27T06:44:45Z

Documentation

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 27 November 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)		Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)
	*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)		*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)
			::What I realised a while ago is that a lot of templates are pretty basic and are simple to explain - so having a giant doc box and subpage for documentation was largely unnecessary. Some templates simply don't need explaining - but adding one or two lines under a usage template could work. Would definitely like to see the documentation template phased out though, so if you are working in those realms - that would be good. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 22:44, 26 November 2010 (PST)

Dethchemist77 at 05:46, 27 November 2010

2010-11-27T05:46:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 27 November 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)		Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)
			*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)

Anonymax: /* Documentation */ new section

2010-11-27T05:33:37Z

Documentation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 27 November 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)		:Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)
	*pm the cwcville library, i'll get her to send you the pms. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 13:42, 21 November 2010 (PST)		*pm the cwcville library, i'll get her to send you the pms. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 13:42, 21 November 2010 (PST)

			== Documentation ==

			Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)

SurfShackTito: /* Can you read some cwcville library pms? */

2010-11-21T21:42:25Z

Can you read some cwcville library pms?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 21 November 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	:Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)		:Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)
			*pm the cwcville library, i'll get her to send you the pms. [[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 13:42, 21 November 2010 (PST)

Dethchemist77 at 21:04, 21 November 2010

2010-11-21T21:04:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 21 November 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==Can you read some cwcville library pms?==		==Can you read some cwcville library pms?==
	The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.If we could talk about this on your youtube or something, that'd be appreciated[[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)		The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.If we could talk about this on your youtube or something, that'd be appreciated[[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)

			:Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)

SurfShackTito: /* Can you read some cwcville library pms? */

2010-11-21T19:54:53Z

Can you read some cwcville library pms?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 21 November 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==Can you read some cwcville library pms?==		==Can you read some cwcville library pms?==
	The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.[[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)		The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.If we could talk about this on your youtube or something, that'd be appreciated[[User:SurfShackTito\|SurfShackTito]] 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 27 November 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)		Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{tl\|usage}} is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)
	*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)		*About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. [[User:Dethchemist77\|Dethchemist77]] 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)
			::What I realised a while ago is that a lot of templates are pretty basic and are simple to explain - so having a giant doc box and subpage for documentation was largely unnecessary. Some templates simply don't need explaining - but adding one or two lines under a usage template could work. Would definitely like to see the documentation template phased out though, so if you are working in those realms - that would be good. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 22:44, 26 November 2010 (PST)