User talk:Djyellow - Revision history

Djyellow at 03:26, 1 July 2010

2010-07-01T03:26:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 30 June 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
	:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			Very well then. That seems okay I suppose.--[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)--[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Thelieisacake at 03:16, 1 July 2010

2010-07-01T03:16:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 30 June 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
	Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Djyellow at 03:05, 1 July 2010

2010-07-01T03:05:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 30 June 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	#It has to then be re-uploaded on a different account so that we can link to it and get the same experience.		#It has to then be re-uploaded on a different account so that we can link to it and get the same experience.
	:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Thelieisacake: I'm going to get this tilde thing down I promise.

2010-07-01T02:46:58Z

I'm going to get this tilde thing down I promise.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 30 June 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	#It has to be downloaded and stored on someone's computer AND someone's DS.		#It has to be downloaded and stored on someone's computer AND someone's DS.
	#It has to then be re-uploaded on a different account so that we can link to it and get the same experience.		#It has to then be re-uploaded on a different account so that we can link to it and get the same experience.
	:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts?		:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Thelieisacake at 02:46, 1 July 2010

2010-07-01T02:46:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 30 June 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I'm not sure what your duty is to Hatena, but you getting his videos taken down and us trying to record all his actions is ''kinda'' a conflict of interest.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		I'm not sure what your duty is to Hatena, but you getting his videos taken down and us trying to record all his actions is ''kinda'' a conflict of interest.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			*I agree with this, and I've been trying to come up with a middle ground. The reason they all get reported is because he's trying to get Chris depressed so that he makes a video (at least, that's what I understand of it), which is a worthy cause in my mind. At the same time, it means that our links are constantly being made redundant, and because they get taken down so quickly, there will come a time when nobody will even have it downloaded in time and we will lose out on chris-related shit. I think the best option is that if a person reports, they have to first meet a few criteria.
			#It has to be OK'd by the editors first. That means we already have a functioning article up.
			#It has to be downloaded and stored on someone's computer AND someone's DS.
			#It has to then be re-uploaded on a different account so that we can link to it and get the same experience.
			:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts?

Beat: /* Reporting Chris's Notes */ new section

2010-07-01T02:40:47Z

Reporting Chris's Notes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{welcome\|Trombonista}}		{{welcome\|Trombonista}}

			== Reporting Chris's Notes ==

			I'm not sure what your duty is to Hatena, but you getting his videos taken down and us trying to record all his actions is ''kinda'' a conflict of interest.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Trombonista: Created page with '{{welcome|Trombonista}}'

2010-07-01T00:55:51Z

Created page with '{{welcome|Trombonista}}'

New page

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 30 June 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
	:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			Very well then. That seems okay I suppose.--[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)--[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 30 June 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		:That's what I'm thinking anyway. Thoughts? [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 02:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
	Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)		Fair enough, Though even though I agree with your idea, there are few flaws with it. For one, Chris locks his Flipnotes. Which pretty much means no one can reupload the flipnote to their account. Also, if for some reason we are able to upload the flipnote to someone else's account, Chris will be automatically be sent a PM saying someone uploaded a "Spin off" of his Flipnote And if there are no changes to the Flipnote at all, Chris has every right to remove the Flipnote. --[[User:Djyellow\|Djyellow]] 03:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
			:Meh, sorry I have no idea how this system works. The best I can come up with is that if we can get someone he trusts to reupload, he wouldn't then have it removed. For example, if Person S is on Chris' good side and tells him that he/she plans to reupload the flipnotes that get taken down so that Chris can continue to get credit for his work, and if S pretends to advertise Chris' profile (e.g. "This is a reupload of Sonichu's flipnote! Go check out his profile for more awesome flipnotes!"), they might just get past Chris and get his approval. At worst, Chris says no. At best, we get something both parties agree to and can accept. [[User:Thelieisacake\|Thelieisacake]] 03:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)