User talk:Kazmeyer - Revision history

Horsehorsehorse at 20:11, 4 October 2010

2010-10-04T20:11:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 4 October 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:No worries. Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it's just been a long-standing argument by the "sink Chris's tugboat" crowd that there had to be some fraud going on because they used Bob's social security information, which you do when applying for SSDI for a dependent child without a work history. My guess is it's in an IRC or a Mumble somewhere. I don't think we've ever gotten direct confirmation on the SSDI/SSI thing, but given all the apocryphal info, the size of the payment, and the fact that Chris doesn't bitch about having to meet with examiners every couple of months to tabulate his assets I'm pretty sure it's disability.		:No worries. Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it's just been a long-standing argument by the "sink Chris's tugboat" crowd that there had to be some fraud going on because they used Bob's social security information, which you do when applying for SSDI for a dependent child without a work history. My guess is it's in an IRC or a Mumble somewhere. I don't think we've ever gotten direct confirmation on the SSDI/SSI thing, but given all the apocryphal info, the size of the payment, and the fact that Chris doesn't bitch about having to meet with examiners every couple of months to tabulate his assets I'm pretty sure it's disability.
	:It also kind of deflates the "Chris is leeching off the taxpayers" argument, too, because what he's really leeching off of is Bob's contributions. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 06:57, 4 October 2010 (PDT)		:It also kind of deflates the "Chris is leeching off the taxpayers" argument, too, because what he's really leeching off of is Bob's contributions. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 06:57, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
			::Ah... yeah, that was something else I was puzzled about on that page. That first paragraph about his benefits just bugged me, esp the bit about "need-based welfare", but I guess I understand the trolling mentality that would want to rock the boat for Chris, pun intended. I don't particularly agree with it; Chris ''is'' legally disabled after all and for all indications would not be able to hold down a job with his emotional development jammed in neutral as it is, but it's better I guess to not give people more reasons to slam him. Not like they need more. Thanks for catching it when you did [[Image:Horse3.gif\|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse\|Talktalktalk]] 13:11, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Kazmeyer at 13:57, 4 October 2010

2010-10-04T13:57:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 4 October 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks [[Image:Horse3.gif\|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse\|Talktalktalk]] 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)		Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks [[Image:Horse3.gif\|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse\|Talktalktalk]] 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
			:No worries. Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it's just been a long-standing argument by the "sink Chris's tugboat" crowd that there had to be some fraud going on because they used Bob's social security information, which you do when applying for SSDI for a dependent child without a work history. My guess is it's in an IRC or a Mumble somewhere. I don't think we've ever gotten direct confirmation on the SSDI/SSI thing, but given all the apocryphal info, the size of the payment, and the fact that Chris doesn't bitch about having to meet with examiners every couple of months to tabulate his assets I'm pretty sure it's disability.
			:It also kind of deflates the "Chris is leeching off the taxpayers" argument, too, because what he's really leeching off of is Bob's contributions. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 06:57, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Horsehorsehorse: /* re: SSI/SSDI */ new section

2010-10-04T11:01:34Z

re: SSI/SSDI: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 4 October 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	IT'S LIKE PVCC FOR CWCKI PEOPLE!		IT'S LIKE PVCC FOR CWCKI PEOPLE!
	[[User:DrShoggoth\|Dr. Herodotus P. Shoggoth :Doktor of the Forbidden Sciences, Medallion Guardian, Imperial Emu, Emeritus of the Ancient and Justified Order of the Turtle]] 13:48, 17 August 2010 (PDT)		[[User:DrShoggoth\|Dr. Herodotus P. Shoggoth :Doktor of the Forbidden Sciences, Medallion Guardian, Imperial Emu, Emeritus of the Ancient and Justified Order of the Turtle]] 13:48, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

			== re: SSI/SSDI ==

			Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks [[Image:Horse3.gif\|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse\|Talktalktalk]] 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

DrShoggoth: /* THE CWCKI FORUM */ new section

2010-08-17T20:48:35Z

THE CWCKI FORUM: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 17 August 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
	:No worries, figured that was the case. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		:No worries, figured that was the case. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

			== THE CWCKI FORUM ==

			http://cwckiforum.proboards.com
			IT'S LIKE PVCC FOR CWCKI PEOPLE!
			[[User:DrShoggoth\|Dr. Herodotus P. Shoggoth :Doktor of the Forbidden Sciences, Medallion Guardian, Imperial Emu, Emeritus of the Ancient and Justified Order of the Turtle]] 13:48, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

Kazmeyer: /* My bad man */

2010-02-20T02:19:30Z

My bad man

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 19 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==My bad man==		==My bad man==
	For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
			:No worries, figured that was the case. [[User:Kazmeyer\|Kazmeyer]] 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Beat at 02:18, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T02:18:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 19 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{welcome}}		{{welcome}}
	--[[User:Delabonte\|Delabonte]] 12:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Delabonte\|Delabonte]] 12:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

			==My bad man==
			For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--[[User:Beat\|Beat]] 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Delabonte: Created page with '{{welcome}} --~~~~'

2010-01-20T12:35:16Z

Created page with '{{welcome}} --~~~~'

New page

{{welcome}}
--[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 12:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)