User talk:NegaCWC - Revision history

Boomhauer: Been a day and an age since I've used the wrong form of 'your'. A little embarrassing.

2015-01-17T22:23:26Z

Been a day and an age since I've used the wrong form of 'your'. A little embarrassing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 17 January 2015
Line 39:		Line 39:
	If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)		If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

	== Good to see ~~your~~ back ==		== Good to see you're back ==

	Been awhile since I've seen you making any edits. Hopefully you're around more; most of your articles are pretty professional. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)		Been awhile since I've seen you making any edits. Hopefully you're around more; most of your articles are pretty professional. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Boomhauer: /* Good to see your back */ new section

2015-01-17T22:22:08Z

Good to see your back: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 17 January 2015
Line 38:		Line 38:

	If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)		If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

			== Good to see your back ==

			Been awhile since I've seen you making any edits. Hopefully you're around more; most of your articles are pretty professional. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Re:Thanks for the promotion! */ new section

2014-10-19T13:39:16Z

Re:Thanks for the promotion!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 19 October 2014
Line 34:		Line 34:

	I'm promoting you to mod status considering there seems to be lacking of mods in a very long time. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)		I'm promoting you to mod status considering there seems to be lacking of mods in a very long time. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

			== Re:Thanks for the promotion! ==

			If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Jerkop status */ new section

2014-10-10T14:41:40Z

Jerkop status: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 10 October 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Add it then. Really sorry for the late reply. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)		Add it then. Really sorry for the late reply. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

			== Jerkop status ==

			I'm promoting you to mod status considering there seems to be lacking of mods in a very long time. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Re: CWC merchandice sent to a forum member */ new section

2014-09-07T06:04:25Z

Re: CWC merchandice sent to a forum member: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 7 September 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl\|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 0:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)		I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl\|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 0:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

			== Re: CWC merchandice sent to a forum member ==

			Add it then. Really sorry for the late reply. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Boomhauer at 00:58, 27 August 2014

2014-08-27T00:58:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 26 August 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== Chris: Homo ==		== Chris: Homo ==

	I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl\|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant.		I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl\|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant. [[User:Boomhauer\|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer\|talk]]) 0:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Boomhauer: /* Chris: Homo */ new section

2014-08-27T00:19:16Z

Chris: Homo: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 26 August 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I'm actually considering of promoting some users to Jerkops. I'll let you know soon. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 02:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)		I'm actually considering of promoting some users to Jerkops. I'll let you know soon. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 02:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

			== Chris: Homo ==

			I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl\|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant.

Alan Pardew: /* Re: Need moar Jerkops */ new section

2014-07-31T02:53:14Z

Re: Need moar Jerkops: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 30 July 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Go ahead. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 12:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)		Go ahead. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 12:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

			== Re: Need moar Jerkops ==

			I'm actually considering of promoting some users to Jerkops. I'll let you know soon. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 02:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Re: 25 July 2014 leak */ new section

2014-07-26T12:57:55Z

Re: 25 July 2014 leak: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 26 July 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:

	* Eh, I think both are acceptable. However, Champ wants this CWCki to have an anti-meme policy so I think I should change it back. Anyway, good job on the re-edit, Skullhat. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 08:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)		* Eh, I think both are acceptable. However, Champ wants this CWCki to have an anti-meme policy so I think I should change it back. Anyway, good job on the re-edit, Skullhat. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 08:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

			== Re: 25 July 2014 leak ==

			Go ahead. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 12:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Memes? */

2014-04-03T08:42:13Z

Memes?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 3 April 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Hey man, thanks for reviewing my changes. You changed the description of that hand drawn Chris picture back to "ORIGINAL IDENTITY. DO NOT STEAL.". I too thought this description was pretty funny but the reason I changed it was because in my mind, people who come to the site and aren't savvy with memes won't understand that reference. I understand that the Cwcki is currently a strange bastardization between ED shitfest and semi-factual fan page so this kind of stuff is unavoidable. I try to lean toward "semi-factual fanpage" and let Chris's antics provide the comedy rather than have editors try hard to make jokes about him in articles. Let me know what you think!		Hey man, thanks for reviewing my changes. You changed the description of that hand drawn Chris picture back to "ORIGINAL IDENTITY. DO NOT STEAL.". I too thought this description was pretty funny but the reason I changed it was because in my mind, people who come to the site and aren't savvy with memes won't understand that reference. I understand that the Cwcki is currently a strange bastardization between ED shitfest and semi-factual fan page so this kind of stuff is unavoidable. I try to lean toward "semi-factual fanpage" and let Chris's antics provide the comedy rather than have editors try hard to make jokes about him in articles. Let me know what you think!
	Cheers! --[[User:Skullhat\|Skullhat]] ([[User talk:Skullhat\|talk]]) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)skullhat		Cheers! --[[User:Skullhat\|Skullhat]] ([[User talk:Skullhat\|talk]]) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)skullhat

			* Eh, I think both are acceptable. However, Champ wants this CWCki to have an anti-meme policy so I think I should change it back. Anyway, good job on the re-edit, Skullhat. [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 08:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)