User talk:OhhhMyAxels - Revision history

OhhhMyAxels at 23:31, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T23:31:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 17 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::Well, there's removing conjecture and theories - and then there's sucking out the fun and facts in the way articles are written. Take [http://www.sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=CWC_Fighter&curid=2860&diff=125370&oldid=125351&rcid=115082 this edit] for example. Removing a link to Lie - big green tick. Removal of the lawn mower section - felt a bit too heavy handed. Conjecture is implied, but those statements reference other articles and facts. I'm undecided as to the last section - it didn't really add much to the article.		::Well, there's removing conjecture and theories - and then there's sucking out the fun and facts in the way articles are written. Take [http://www.sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=CWC_Fighter&curid=2860&diff=125370&oldid=125351&rcid=115082 this edit] for example. Removing a link to Lie - big green tick. Removal of the lawn mower section - felt a bit too heavy handed. Conjecture is implied, but those statements reference other articles and facts. I'm undecided as to the last section - it didn't really add much to the article.
	::I think if you can remove clear conjecture, blatant insults towards Chris (which refers to things like "he is, in fact, sitting down the entire time, '''the lazy ass'''." - editors sometimes get carried away), without sucking the slight humour and occasional relevant trivia out of the articles, then by all means do that. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:25, 17 November 2010 (PST)		::I think if you can remove clear conjecture, blatant insults towards Chris (which refers to things like "he is, in fact, sitting down the entire time, '''the lazy ass'''." - editors sometimes get carried away), without sucking the slight humour and occasional relevant trivia out of the articles, then by all means do that. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:25, 17 November 2010 (PST)
			: Well my feeling was that the transcripts usually provided stuff like that, which is why I left those untouched for the most part. But I understand what you're saying. I'll be more careful and discuss aforementioned changes beforehand. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 15:31, 17 November 2010 (PST)

Anonymax at 23:25, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T23:25:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 17 November 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)		: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)
	: The direction the CWCki wants to take is one of less subjectivity, as noted by the message on the main page. All I've been doing is removing insults and unnecessary filler from pages. If you want me to stop, I will. I'm just trying to make the pages adhere to the rules set by the site owners. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 15:02, 17 November 2010 (PST)		: The direction the CWCki wants to take is one of less subjectivity, as noted by the message on the main page. All I've been doing is removing insults and unnecessary filler from pages. If you want me to stop, I will. I'm just trying to make the pages adhere to the rules set by the site owners. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 15:02, 17 November 2010 (PST)
			::Well, there's removing conjecture and theories - and then there's sucking out the fun and facts in the way articles are written. Take [http://www.sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=CWC_Fighter&curid=2860&diff=125370&oldid=125351&rcid=115082 this edit] for example. Removing a link to Lie - big green tick. Removal of the lawn mower section - felt a bit too heavy handed. Conjecture is implied, but those statements reference other articles and facts. I'm undecided as to the last section - it didn't really add much to the article.
			::I think if you can remove clear conjecture, blatant insults towards Chris (which refers to things like "he is, in fact, sitting down the entire time, '''the lazy ass'''." - editors sometimes get carried away), without sucking the slight humour and occasional relevant trivia out of the articles, then by all means do that. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 15:25, 17 November 2010 (PST)

OhhhMyAxels at 23:02, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T23:02:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 17 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)
	: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)		: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)
			: The direction the CWCki wants to take is one of less subjectivity, as noted by the message on the main page. All I've been doing is removing insults and unnecessary filler from pages. If you want me to stop, I will. I'm just trying to make the pages adhere to the rules set by the site owners. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 15:02, 17 November 2010 (PST)

Anonymax: No edit wars

2010-11-17T22:08:16Z

No edit wars

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 17 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)
			: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)

OhhhMyAxels at 21:25, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T21:25:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 17 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Stop changing the pages, faggot. --[[User:Miss Noel\|Noel Ari Paige]] 10:16, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Stop changing the pages, faggot. --[[User:Miss Noel\|Noel Ari Paige]] 10:16, 17 November 2010 (PST)

	Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)

OhhhMyAxels at 21:17, 17 November 2010

2010-11-17T21:17:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 17 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Stop changing the pages, faggot. --[[User:Miss Noel\|Noel Ari Paige]] 10:16, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Stop changing the pages, faggot. --[[User:Miss Noel\|Noel Ari Paige]] 10:16, 17 November 2010 (PST)

			Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)

Anonymax: moved User:OhhhMyAxels to User talk:OhhhMyAxels: Talk pages are for talking

2010-11-17T19:00:12Z

moved User:OhhhMyAxels to User talk:OhhhMyAxels: Talk pages are for talking

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:00, 17 November 2010
(No difference)

Miss Noel: Created page with "Stop changing the pages, faggot. --~~~~"

2010-11-17T18:16:09Z

Created page with "Stop changing the pages, faggot. --~~~~"

New page

Stop changing the pages, faggot. --[[User:Miss Noel|Noel Ari Paige]] 10:16, 17 November 2010 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 17 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)		Shit needs to get cleaned. Deal with it and follow the rules. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 13:17, 17 November 2010 (PST)
	: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)		: Clearly if an editor disagrees with your edits, you don't keep re-adding it. Discussion about the edits should be opened up on the article's talk page. Further edit warring will result in bans for both sides. --[[User:Anonymax\|Anonymax]] 14:08, 17 November 2010 (PST)
			: The direction the CWCki wants to take is one of less subjectivity, as noted by the message on the main page. All I've been doing is removing insults and unnecessary filler from pages. If you want me to stop, I will. I'm just trying to make the pages adhere to the rules set by the site owners. --[[User:OhhhMyAxels\|OhhhMyAxels]] 15:02, 17 November 2010 (PST)