User talk:Taco Wiz - Revision history

Taco Wiz: /* Delete your user page? */

2014-11-30T05:30:24Z

Delete your user page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 30 November 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Do you want me to delete your user page considering your edits on your user page? [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)		Do you want me to delete your user page considering your edits on your user page? [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

			Sure, I guess, so long as I can still make edits on occasion. --[[User:Taco Wiz\|Taco Wiz]] ([[User talk:Taco Wiz\|talk]]) 05:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Alan Pardew: /* Delete your user page? */ new section

2014-07-06T14:45:17Z

Delete your user page?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 6 July 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think it's such a good idea to put that on the front page where Chris is likely to see it. Remember how it was obtained, how paranoid Chris is at the moment, and what will happen if Chris finds out that we have that information. As far as I know, Chris just skims the front page and checks Da Update to see if anything new happened, so the content is safe where it is.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 7 March 2012 (PST)		I don't think it's such a good idea to put that on the front page where Chris is likely to see it. Remember how it was obtained, how paranoid Chris is at the moment, and what will happen if Chris finds out that we have that information. As far as I know, Chris just skims the front page and checks Da Update to see if anything new happened, so the content is safe where it is.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 7 March 2012 (PST)
	:The reason I didn't revert it immediately is because they were acquired by Ali Baboo, who from what I hear has been outed as a troll by Chris. I think it's safe to include them on Da Update because he knows he was infiltrated, but we'd have to keep the Facebook page non-current in that case, which I guess is worse than just keeping it off da update. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 08:19, 7 March 2012 (PST)		:The reason I didn't revert it immediately is because they were acquired by Ali Baboo, who from what I hear has been outed as a troll by Chris. I think it's safe to include them on Da Update because he knows he was infiltrated, but we'd have to keep the Facebook page non-current in that case, which I guess is worse than just keeping it off da update. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 08:19, 7 March 2012 (PST)

			== Delete your user page? ==

			Do you want me to delete your user page considering your edits on your user page? [[User:Alan Pardew\|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew\|talk]]) 14:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Freecell at 16:19, 7 March 2012

2012-03-07T16:19:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 7 March 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Re: Da Update==		==Re: Da Update==
	I don't think it's such a good idea to put that on the front page where Chris is likely to see it. Remember how it was obtained, how paranoid Chris is at the moment, and what will happen if Chris finds out that we have that information. As far as I know, Chris just skims the front page and checks Da Update to see if anything new happened, so the content is safe where it is.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 7 March 2012 (PST)		I don't think it's such a good idea to put that on the front page where Chris is likely to see it. Remember how it was obtained, how paranoid Chris is at the moment, and what will happen if Chris finds out that we have that information. As far as I know, Chris just skims the front page and checks Da Update to see if anything new happened, so the content is safe where it is.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 7 March 2012 (PST)
			:The reason I didn't revert it immediately is because they were acquired by Ali Baboo, who from what I hear has been outed as a troll by Chris. I think it's safe to include them on Da Update because he knows he was infiltrated, but we'd have to keep the Facebook page non-current in that case, which I guess is worse than just keeping it off da update. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] ([[User talk:Freecell\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|contribs]]) </span></small> 08:19, 7 March 2012 (PST)

MoarLurk at 16:16, 7 March 2012

2012-03-07T16:16:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 7 March 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Chris is indeed and idiot and I think it was a terrible idea. I do, however, think documenting the events in their entirety is a good idea. The more information, the better. There's so much we don't know about Chris, and we should take advantage of all we do know. --[[User:Taco Wiz\|Taco Wiz]] 15:25, 16 August 2011 (PDT)		Chris is indeed and idiot and I think it was a terrible idea. I do, however, think documenting the events in their entirety is a good idea. The more information, the better. There's so much we don't know about Chris, and we should take advantage of all we do know. --[[User:Taco Wiz\|Taco Wiz]] 15:25, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

			==Re: Da Update==
			I don't think it's such a good idea to put that on the front page where Chris is likely to see it. Remember how it was obtained, how paranoid Chris is at the moment, and what will happen if Chris finds out that we have that information. As far as I know, Chris just skims the front page and checks Da Update to see if anything new happened, so the content is safe where it is.--[[User:MoarLurk\|MoarLurk]] 08:16, 7 March 2012 (PST)

Taco Wiz: /* Re: SheCameForCWC.jpg */

2011-08-16T22:25:10Z

Re: SheCameForCWC.jpg

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 16 August 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	If you feel it's important to state Chris's justifications for doing something, it would probably be better to add another section for that purpose. However it shouldn't be worded in such a way that makes it look like white knighting for Chris. – [[User:BrianBash\|BrianBash]] ([[User_talk:BrianBash\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/BrianBash\|cont]]) 14:50, 16 August 2011 (PDT)		If you feel it's important to state Chris's justifications for doing something, it would probably be better to add another section for that purpose. However it shouldn't be worded in such a way that makes it look like white knighting for Chris. – [[User:BrianBash\|BrianBash]] ([[User_talk:BrianBash\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/BrianBash\|cont]]) 14:50, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

			Chris is indeed and idiot and I think it was a terrible idea. I do, however, think documenting the events in their entirety is a good idea. The more information, the better. There's so much we don't know about Chris, and we should take advantage of all we do know. --[[User:Taco Wiz\|Taco Wiz]] 15:25, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

BrianBash at 21:50, 16 August 2011

2011-08-16T21:50:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 16 August 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
	:"Where no shit is too minor." I blame withdrawal symptoms. I need my fix, etc. Oddly, I think I did actually see something similar to a graph showing times Chris logged into Youtube at one point. I won't press the point and make an asshat of myself though. Like you said we can have a Summer of 2011 article later. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 06:52, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:"Where no shit is too minor." I blame withdrawal symptoms. I need my fix, etc. Oddly, I think I did actually see something similar to a graph showing times Chris logged into Youtube at one point. I won't press the point and make an asshat of myself though. Like you said we can have a Summer of 2011 article later. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 06:52, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

			==Re: CWC's Second Message==
			The ED page did not cause Megan to fall out with Chris - their "relationship" was already deteriorating long before that thanks to Chris's outbursts at Megan spending time with male friends who weren't Chris and his excessive unwanted touching. ED was simply the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. – [[User:BrianBash\|BrianBash]] ([[User_talk:BrianBash\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/BrianBash\|cont]]) 14:50, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

			==Re: SheCameForCWC.jpg==
			Your edits did not add any objective information to the article. The changes looked like something Chris would do to try and spread his own version of "TRUTH and HONESTY" on ED or the CWCki. Drawing and uploading cartoon porn does nothing to "prove" ones sexual orientation.

			If you feel it's important to state Chris's justifications for doing something, it would probably be better to add another section for that purpose. However it shouldn't be worded in such a way that makes it look like white knighting for Chris. – [[User:BrianBash\|BrianBash]] ([[User_talk:BrianBash\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/BrianBash\|cont]]) 14:50, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

Nullity: Está bien, entonces

2011-06-22T13:52:50Z

Está bien, entonces

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 22 June 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
	:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
			:"Where no shit is too minor." I blame withdrawal symptoms. I need my fix, etc. Oddly, I think I did actually see something similar to a graph showing times Chris logged into Youtube at one point. I won't press the point and make an asshat of myself though. Like you said we can have a Summer of 2011 article later. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 06:52, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

Champthom: /* Da Update */

2011-06-22T12:55:31Z

Da Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 22 June 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
	:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
			:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

Nullity: ¿Qué, señor?

2011-06-22T10:44:54Z

¿Qué, señor?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 22 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
			:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

Freecell at 08:13, 22 June 2011

2011-06-22T08:13:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 22 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Welcome\|Trombonista}}		{{Welcome\|Trombonista}}

			==Da Update==

			Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 22 June 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
	:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
			:"Where no shit is too minor." I blame withdrawal symptoms. I need my fix, etc. Oddly, I think I did actually see something similar to a graph showing times Chris logged into Youtube at one point. I won't press the point and make an asshat of myself though. Like you said we can have a Summer of 2011 article later. [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 06:52, 22 June 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 22 June 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		Champ's decided that it doesn't count as "Da Update"-worthy, so I had to remove it. [[User:Freecell\|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell\|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell\|c)]] 01:13, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
	:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)		:Sorry, this is probably not my place to say but wasn't new phone messages acceptable two months ago? [[User:Nullity\|Nullity]] 03:44, 22 June 2011 (PDT)
			:*I think that counting a phone message changing as an update is sorta scraping the bottom of the barrel, you know? It sets a precedent to include any inane thing as an update, like Chris logging onto YouTube or Chris buying a new pair of socks. Of course, that's my opinion and if considerable amount of people disagree with me, I am more than willing to change my position on that. But it's just my thought that people are updating da update for the sake of updating it. If nothing happens this month, that's fine, same with the next few months. We can easily just have a "Summer of 2011" article for the months Chris is inactive. So yeah, it's not like it's imperative to have an update.--[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 05:55, 22 June 2011 (PDT)