Valentines Day Hymn - Revision history

JinkiesJanke: /* Valentines Day Hymn */

2024-02-15T00:56:13Z

Valentines Day Hymn

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 14 February 2024
Line 22:		Line 22:
	The man's coat over a puddle,		The man's coat over a puddle,
	The maiden walks,		The maiden walks,
	Then the man trips and pays the laundry bill.		Then the man trips and pays the [[DIRTY, CRAPPED BRIEFS\|laundry bill]].
	Under the moonlight,		Under the moonlight,
	The couples of the world kiss,		The couples of the world kiss,

WarnerBro: /* Analysis */

2023-04-25T00:06:54Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 24 April 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==Analysis==		==Analysis==
	Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem-writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[~~Stress~~\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.		Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem-writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[Chris and stress\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.

	The poem seems to be about a [[Christian Weston Chandler\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's rights\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and Valentine's Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on Valentine's Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[random-access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.		The poem seems to be about a [[Christian Weston Chandler\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's rights\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and Valentine's Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on Valentine's Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[random-access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.

Eamoo: Undo revision 289362 by Eamoo (talk)

2022-05-27T21:07:38Z

Undo revision 289362 by Eamoo (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 27 May 2022
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>		Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>

	With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris ~~opts~~ for ~~the~~ literal ~~school of~~ translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the ~~poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an~~ acceptable ~~style~~ for ~~translating~~ literary ~~works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language~~.		With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris goes for a literal translation, opting to translate word for word without regard for the original rhythm of the poem—hardly acceptable for a literary work.

	===Chris's translation===		===Chris's translation===

Eamoo: Reverted edits by KUG.SIG17 (talk) to last revision by Resrsc

2022-05-25T16:24:51Z

Reverted edits by KUG.SIG17 (talk) to last revision by Resrsc

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 25 May 2022
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>		Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>

	With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris ~~goes~~ for a literal translation, opting to translate word for word without regard ~~for~~ the original rhythm of the ~~poem—hardly~~ acceptable for a ~~literary work~~.		With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris opts for the literal school of translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an acceptable style for translating literary works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language.

	===Chris's translation===		===Chris's translation===

KUG.SIG17: long-winded superfluous autism

2022-05-23T10:26:04Z

long-winded superfluous autism

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 23 May 2022
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>		Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>

	With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris ~~opts~~ for ~~the~~ literal ~~school of~~ translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the ~~poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an~~ acceptable ~~style~~ for ~~translating~~ literary ~~works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language~~.		With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris goes for a literal translation, opting to translate word for word without regard for the original rhythm of the poem—hardly acceptable for a literary work.

	===Chris's translation===		===Chris's translation===

Resrsc: archive

2021-09-14T00:43:03Z

Y0h 513nn R3n: /* Analysis */

2019-06-17T09:46:42Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 17 June 2019
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem-writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[Stress\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.		Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem-writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[Stress\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.

	The poem seems to be about a [[Christian Weston Chandler\|\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's rights\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and Valentine's Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on Valentine's Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[random-access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.		The poem seems to be about a [[Christian Weston Chandler\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's rights\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and Valentine's Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on Valentine's Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[random-access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.

	Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this poem is its nonchalant and cheerful attitude toward dating and romance. After his [[love quest]] began in 2003, Chris was known to complain about the [[Infinitely-High Boyfriend-Factor]] and called the rest of the human males [[JERKS]]. He would often bemoan his sad and lonely state. At the time this song was written though, Chris was apparently not too hurried to find a sweetheart, and was more than willing to celebrate the love of others.		Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this poem is its nonchalant and cheerful attitude toward dating and romance. After his [[love quest]] began in 2003, Chris was known to complain about the [[Infinitely-High Boyfriend-Factor]] and called the rest of the human males [[JERKS]]. He would often bemoan his sad and lonely state. At the time this song was written though, Chris was apparently not too hurried to find a sweetheart, and was more than willing to celebrate the love of others.

MathevsEff: /* Analysis */

2018-08-08T20:59:08Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 8 August 2018
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==Analysis==		==Analysis==
			Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem-writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[Stress\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.

	Chris tried his hand at free-verse with this poem. While some may see this as a bold, modern approach to poem writing, it is more likely that Chris was just too lazy to adhere to any sort of rhyming pattern or meter, instead writing down whatever the hell came out of his head without having to deal with the [[Stress\|stress]] of a rigid pattern.		The poem seems to be about a [[Christian Weston Chandler\|\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's rights\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and Valentine's Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on Valentine's Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[random-access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.

	The poem seems to be about a [[~~Chris~~\|clumsy, broke man]] and his lousy date (note the implication that the girl is [[Women's ~~Rights~~\|shallow and only cares about money]]), but Chris deems it necessary to break up this story with some barely relevant thoughts on love and ~~Valentines~~ Day, making the poem even harder to read than it needs to be. The poem also does a great job in showing Chris's ignorance. He seems to believe that fireworks are only used on ~~Valentines~~ Day and the Fourth of July, he has no idea what the term "hearty" means, and that he thinks a woman would do her laundry on a date with a man. Chris wraps up this steaming pile of failure with a sprinkle of [[~~Random Access Humor\|~~random access humor]] to ruin any sort of beauty that he lazily tries to create.

	Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this poem is its nonchalant and cheerful attitude toward dating and romance. After his [[love quest]] began in 2003, Chris was known to complain about the [[Infinitely-High Boyfriend-Factor]] and called the rest of the human males [[JERKS]]. He would often bemoan his sad and lonely state. At the time this song was written though, Chris was apparently not too hurried to find a sweetheart, and was more than willing to celebrate the love of others.		Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this poem is its nonchalant and cheerful attitude toward dating and romance. After his [[love quest]] began in 2003, Chris was known to complain about the [[Infinitely-High Boyfriend-Factor]] and called the rest of the human males [[JERKS]]. He would often bemoan his sad and lonely state. At the time this song was written though, Chris was apparently not too hurried to find a sweetheart, and was more than willing to celebrate the love of others.

MathevsEff: /* Spanish version */

2018-08-08T20:55:23Z

Spanish version

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 8 August 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:

	==Spanish version==		==Spanish version==
	Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the ~~PokéSite~~, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>		Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the Pokésite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>

	With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris opts for the literal school of translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an acceptable style for translating literary works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language.		With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris opts for the literal school of translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an acceptable style for translating literary works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language.

MathevsEff: /* Spanish version */

2018-08-08T20:52:42Z

Spanish version

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 8 August 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:

	==Spanish version==		==Spanish version==
	Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the ~~PokeSite~~, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>		Chris wrote an alternate version for the Spanish version of the PokéSite, later put up on the [[CWCipedia]].<ref>http://archive.sonichu.com/cwcipedia/index.php?title=CWC_Speaks</ref>

	With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris opts for the literal school of translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an acceptable style for translating literary works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language.		With very minor exceptions (such as the last line, which literally translates to "Yes?" as opposed to "Didn't they?"), Chris opts for the literal school of translation, opting to translate word for word without regard to the original rhythm of the poem. Academically and professionally, literal translation is not considered an acceptable style for translating literary works or poetry from a Romance language, such as Spanish, into the English language.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 13 September 2021
Line 140:		Line 140:
	{{Infobox/Fanvideo		{{Infobox/Fanvideo
	\| name = Dramatic Reading		\| name = Dramatic Reading
	\| ~~video~~ = ~~{{#ev:youtube\|~~1rN7PtUMMYg}}		\| ytid = 1rN7PtUMMYg
	\| stardate = 28 [[May 2010]]		\| stardate = 28 [[May 2010]]
	\| maker = [http://www.youtube.com/user/manwithoutabody manwithoutabody]		\| maker = [http://www.youtube.com/user/manwithoutabody manwithoutabody]