Difference between revisions of "User talk:TippyToesTommyTalarico"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re: new section)
(→‎Re: sign)
Line 9: Line 9:
== Re ==
== Re ==


Um, no Tommy, to be honest you just read like you have a personal agenda against those who fap to cartoons, so it's not relevant at all if Chris does or used to do it, you seem to want to hammer that into the article as the most serious transgression Chris has done just because you personally dislike that. Please keep that off the page, thanks.
Um, no Tommy, to be honest you just read like you have a personal agenda against those who fap to cartoons, so it's not relevant at all if Chris does or used to do it, you seem to want to hammer that into the article as the most serious transgression Chris has done just because you personally dislike that. Please keep that off the page, thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:UnJammerLammy|UnJammerLammy]] ([[User talk:UnJammerLammy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UnJammerLammy|contribs]]) </span></small>

Revision as of 22:18, 9 December 2021

Reply

Hi there. To be bluntly honest, the thing is that Chris finding cartoons arousing isn't really that relevant and you seem quite eager to add that information as if it were the worst thing Chris has ever done just because you agreed with Howard Stern's opinion that people who fap to drawings are disgusting.

Also, by "exceptional", no, I didn't mean "retarded", just that Chris is far from the only person to fap to cartoons (and no, not everyone who does that ends up as an actual sex offender/alleged rapist) and as such is irrelevant to point it out, especially when the examples you wrote in the page are from things that happened over 10 years ago (the Sailor Moon poster and the R34 Sonichu drawings) and that Chris has probably long forgotten. I think is best that you don't readd that section. Have a good day, Tommy.

UmJammer Lammy, 26 November 2021.

Re

Um, no Tommy, to be honest you just read like you have a personal agenda against those who fap to cartoons, so it's not relevant at all if Chris does or used to do it, you seem to want to hammer that into the article as the most serious transgression Chris has done just because you personally dislike that. Please keep that off the page, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UnJammerLammy (talkcontribs)