Difference between revisions of "File talk:Kroger sighting.jpg"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 12: Line 12:
*Enough material here to warrent an article me thinks. ''WHERE NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR''--[[User:Bentduck|Bentduck]] 12:27, 13 November 2010 (PST)
*Enough material here to warrent an article me thinks. ''WHERE NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR''--[[User:Bentduck|Bentduck]] 12:27, 13 November 2010 (PST)
**Is there a Chris in the wild article it could be added to?  If not, it could provide links to all the offline sightings of Chris at Fridays after Five, the coffee place article, the mall sighting, etc. [[User:Whispsonichu|Whispsonichu]] 05:34, 14 November 2010 (PST)
**Is there a Chris in the wild article it could be added to?  If not, it could provide links to all the offline sightings of Chris at Fridays after Five, the coffee place article, the mall sighting, etc. [[User:Whispsonichu|Whispsonichu]] 05:34, 14 November 2010 (PST)
***I agree with the notion of adding it to a "Chris in the Wild" article, (or creating one if no such article exists, which a quick search seems to confirm.) It is at least mildly interesting whenever he gets encountered outside of Branchland or his select few haunts, but not ''every'' time is noteworthy or relevant on its own. This seems like a fair compromise between what seems to be two camps on this issue: those who agree that NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR and those that agree that some shit just isn't quite relevant. We can include this information on sort of a standing, running list of times Chris has been spotted, but it's not sitting on its own, either, which I don't think it really deserves to since ultimately all that happened was Chris sat in a grocery store and ate a pound of frozen shitty processed food. Sound agreeable to anyone? --[[User:Bluedeanie|Bluedeanie]] 09:32, 15 November 2010 (PST)
***I agree with the notion of adding it to a "Chris in the Wild" article, (or creating one if no such article exists, which a quick search seems to confirm.) It is at least mildly interesting whenever he gets encountered outside of Branchland or his select few haunts, but not ''every'' time is noteworthy or relevant on its own. This seems like a fair compromise between what seems to be two camps on this issue: those who agree that NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR and those who agree that some shit just isn't quite relevant. We can include this information on sort of a standing, running list of times Chris has been spotted, but it's not sitting on its own, either, which I don't think it really deserves to since ultimately all that happened was Chris sat in a grocery store and ate a pound of frozen shitty processed food. Sound agreeable to anyone? --[[User:Bluedeanie|Bluedeanie]] 09:32, 15 November 2010 (PST)

Revision as of 13:33, 15 November 2010

Kroger's does sell Hungry Man dinners. I know the ones near me here in Richmond, VA are starting to remodel. And they also sell Sushi & sake. ShinGokuIAM 09:11, 11 November 2010 (PST)

  • Shouldn't it be noted that this is probably some way to take advantage of eating for free on Veterans day? This is going on Speculation.SurfShackTito 11:47, 11 November 2010 (PST)
    • Anyone else disturbed at this? I'm for mocking the stuff he releases or when he makes a public idiot out of himself, but randomly taking pictures of him when he's sitting around doing nothing is kinda pushing it. Supersheep 19:29, 11 November 2010 (EST)
      • Seconded. Really, everything is a bit much. Having a wiki with srs bsns rules is too much. Transcribing his every word is too much. Pretty much everyone here really takes shit too far. Freecell 16:35, 11 November 2010 (PST)
        • WELCOME TO THE CWCKI HAVE FUN LOLOLOL -- Clyde 16:45, 11 November 2010 (PST)
        • I forgot the CWCki's motto was "WHERE NO SHIT IS TO MINOR (Except when we doccument Chris in the wild, that's just taking it too far)". --Thorgnzorrg 17:40, 11 November 2010 (PST)
  • I just realized this is the first update on Chris since the Manchester 10 year High School reunion occurred (November 08, 2010)... did he go, or what? --Robotnik 02:54, 12 November 2010 (PST)
  • Is this photo nessescarily achieving something? I mean, we have a ton of pictures of Chris, and this one is very poor quality, not to say it's worthless, it's just that it dosent feel like it's needed. --Jakkarra 14:35, 12 November 2010 (PST)
    • When you're addicted to cocaine, you'll always try to snort the empty wrapper when you don't have anything else available. Or maybe that's chocolate i duno lulz XD Freecell 15:04, 12 November 2010 (PST)
      • It is a rare sighting of the manchild in the wild! Outside the confines of the dungeon on Branchland Ct. Mr Pants 16:43, 12 November 2010 (PST)
  • Enough material here to warrent an article me thinks. WHERE NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR--Bentduck 12:27, 13 November 2010 (PST)
    • Is there a Chris in the wild article it could be added to? If not, it could provide links to all the offline sightings of Chris at Fridays after Five, the coffee place article, the mall sighting, etc. Whispsonichu 05:34, 14 November 2010 (PST)
      • I agree with the notion of adding it to a "Chris in the Wild" article, (or creating one if no such article exists, which a quick search seems to confirm.) It is at least mildly interesting whenever he gets encountered outside of Branchland or his select few haunts, but not every time is noteworthy or relevant on its own. This seems like a fair compromise between what seems to be two camps on this issue: those who agree that NO SHIT IS TOO MINOR and those who agree that some shit just isn't quite relevant. We can include this information on sort of a standing, running list of times Chris has been spotted, but it's not sitting on its own, either, which I don't think it really deserves to since ultimately all that happened was Chris sat in a grocery store and ate a pound of frozen shitty processed food. Sound agreeable to anyone? --Bluedeanie 09:32, 15 November 2010 (PST)