Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scale of Respect"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Could someone make a drawing for this? Normally I wouldn't consider this worthy of an entire article but it's something fucked up Chris thought of to deal with social interactions that it's worthy to focus on. I think it could use a picture though. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:09, 8 June 2009 (CEST)
Could someone make a drawing for this? Normally I wouldn't consider this worthy of an entire article but it's something fucked up Chris thought of to deal with social interactions that it's worthy to focus on. I think it could use a picture though. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:09, 8 June 2009 (CEST)
* I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
* I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
::* Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^
::* Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-

Revision as of 14:29, 24 June 2009

Could someone make a drawing for this? Normally I wouldn't consider this worthy of an entire article but it's something fucked up Chris thought of to deal with social interactions that it's worthy to focus on. I think it could use a picture though. --Champthom 22:09, 8 June 2009 (CEST)

  • I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. RachmaninovDESU 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
  • Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...
Points People who fall into this category
10. Respect. Christian Weston Chandler
9. God; Jesus
8. Barbara Chandler
7. Bob Chandler; The President of the United States
6. Gal-Pals; Family Members; Boyfriend-free girls
5. Buddies; Average Single Men
4. Non-Single Men
3. Jerkops; Manajerks
2. Mary Lee Walsh; Wes Iseli; Jason Kendrick Howell; ScotPallazo
1. Satan
0. No respect. Trolls; 4-cent Garbage Employees

Check it out now. RachmaninovDESU 20:27, 24 June 2009 (CEST)