Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Da update"
m (→Da update versus CWCipediaTracker: new section) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Seriously, I am disappoint. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | Seriously, I am disappoint. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I think a lot of that is my fault. I didn't understand the difference; I assumed they overlapped. - **** | |||
Revision as of 11:17, 17 February 2010
Three videos from the 12th
Why are they not here? We have Chris singing, Chris out in public with actual sunlight, and making a dumb as fuck comment, that is what an update is, my friends. You may be saying "But Champthom, why haven't you?" and I say to you "NO U!" Seriously, stuff should go on this template first before it ends up on the CWChronology. Srsly. --Champthom 03:30, 15 July 2009 (CEST)
Gardening
Did a little gardening by removing a few of the posts from this template. It was taking up quite a bit of room on the main page.
Remember to add to both Da Update and the corresponding month and vice versa, sometimes this doesn't happen. Granola 02:11, 16 August 2009 (CEST)
Da update versus CWCipediaTracker
People, please, given the status of the CWCipedia, all CWCipedia related updates belong in the CWCipedia Tracker whereas things like new videos, leaked material, etc. belong here in Da update.
Seriously, I am disappoint. --Champthom 02:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think a lot of that is my fault. I didn't understand the difference; I assumed they overlapped. - ****