Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and writing"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
If we're going to make fun of Chris for being a shitty writer, this page should probably be written with at least, you know, proper grammar; less purple prose would be nice too. But I can't be arsed to do it right now so I'm gonna bitch about it here. At least that way it'll show up in my watchlist and I won't forget about it. --[[User:Sonichuis44|sonichuis44]] 19:49, 4 December 2009 (CET) | If we're going to make fun of Chris for being a shitty writer, this page should probably be written with at least, you know, proper grammar; less purple prose would be nice too. But I can't be arsed to do it right now so I'm gonna bitch about it here. At least that way it'll show up in my watchlist and I won't forget about it. --[[User:Sonichuis44|sonichuis44]] 19:49, 4 December 2009 (CET) | ||
To be fair, the extravagant language is probably intended to make a point. Namely, that you don't have to [[CWC-isms|use the same words over and over.]] But still, you got a point. I'll clean things up a little, but really, my grammar is only marginally better than Chris's. --[[User:Jump|Jump]] 23:07, 4 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 18:07, 4 December 2009
This is cool. Should we try and incorporate the information from Chris and English here?--Why, it's Beat! Hi Beat! 19:14, 2 December 2009 (CET)
- Possibly, at least some of this. Chris and English would ideally only cover Chris's frequent weird word usages and grammatical stumbling; I thought this article would cover things at higher level than that. The English article is also currently a bit weird case: I kept writing about Chris's semantics, but some people thought that stuff might better be discussed in Autism (or perhaps, in my opinion, yet another split article). --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 19:21, 2 December 2009 (CET)
this could use some work. i'll pitch in; but someone with actual skills (ergo, not me) should get on this. could be really interesting. edit:Chris and short fiction down edit two: Chris and blogging downJump 00:00, 3 December 2009 (CET)
I did most of the lyrics and poetry section. --Spandam-sama 01:05, 3 December 2009 (CET)
If we're going to make fun of Chris for being a shitty writer, this page should probably be written with at least, you know, proper grammar; less purple prose would be nice too. But I can't be arsed to do it right now so I'm gonna bitch about it here. At least that way it'll show up in my watchlist and I won't forget about it. --sonichuis44 19:49, 4 December 2009 (CET)
To be fair, the extravagant language is probably intended to make a point. Namely, that you don't have to use the same words over and over. But still, you got a point. I'll clean things up a little, but really, my grammar is only marginally better than Chris's. --Jump 23:07, 4 December 2009 (CET)