Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shigeru Miyamoto"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New section: lol)
Line 20: Line 20:


:::*Oh - I totally agree. Back when I wrote the transcript, I just had no idea how to make a new page, as I was saying above. So, I ended up adding a bunch of useful info, but in the wrong place. Now, I understand how to make all of the edits that I just made, so everything is finally squared away. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 17:04, 4 June 2009 (CEST)
:::*Oh - I totally agree. Back when I wrote the transcript, I just had no idea how to make a new page, as I was saying above. So, I ended up adding a bunch of useful info, but in the wrong place. Now, I understand how to make all of the edits that I just made, so everything is finally squared away. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 17:04, 4 June 2009 (CEST)
== lol ==
: "''...using a spoof e-mail sender (hence the awkward backslashes)...''"
This is facepalm-inducing. [[User:Axe|Axe]] 10:18, 11 June 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 04:18, 11 June 2009

To do

  • picture of Miyamoto Done
  • Chris's video to Miyamoto Done
  • various correspondence with Miyamoto
  • also add that original correspondence where he shoots down the Sonichu idea. Done, but it could use block quote format for such a long e-mail. Someone, get on that plz.
  • Also, someone find the quote where he says he will only accept written contact from Nintendo. --Champthom 00:39, 10 February 2009 (CET)
  • The other night, Clyde revealed to Chris he was really Miyamoto. Can someone find out when? Also, when did Chris call Miyamoto out as a troll? --Champthom 13:28, 17 February 2009 (CET)
Does Chris think Clyde IS Miyamoto IRL? Or that the real Miyamoto is trolling him?--UncleBastard 15:39, 17 February 2009 (CET)
No, just that a troll was impersonating Miyamoto. --Champthom 06:51, 11 March 2009 (CET)
  • Seriously, this article is completely lacking the Miyamoto saga e-mails, which Clyde just re-released. Someone post them here sometime. --Champthom 06:51, 11 March 2009 (CET)
    • I know I said the video, but I believe what I meant was mentioning the video, not the entire video and a transcript. Seriously, it should get its own article. --Champthom 20:09, 26 May 2009 (CEST) Done. Llort 09:14, 4 June 2009 (CEST)

Video

That video and transcript really doesn't belong here. Is there an article for that video yet? If not, make one. Seriously, kinda detracts from the article which should be focusing on Miyamoto and Chris's interactions. A brief mention of the video should suffice, with the video getting its own article. --Champthom 20:08, 26 May 2009 (CEST)

  • I was the one who wrote up the transcript for the video a few days ago, and I was just thinking today that the video and transcript should really have their own page together. I would make that change myself, but doing so is beyond my current CWCki-editing talents. Llort 22:21, 26 May 2009 (CEST) Done. Llort 09:12, 4 June 2009 (CEST)
  • Thanks. I had nothing against a video transcript, only that it doesn't belong in this article and really should be focused on Miyamoto and going into Chris's video to him kinda detracts from it, especially when every other video Chris makes gets its own page. --Champthom 11:05, 4 June 2009 (CEST)
  • Oh - I totally agree. Back when I wrote the transcript, I just had no idea how to make a new page, as I was saying above. So, I ended up adding a bunch of useful info, but in the wrong place. Now, I understand how to make all of the edits that I just made, so everything is finally squared away. Llort 17:04, 4 June 2009 (CEST)

lol

"...using a spoof e-mail sender (hence the awkward backslashes)..."

This is facepalm-inducing. Axe 10:18, 11 June 2009 (CEST)