Difference between revisions of "Talk:Virginia is for Virgins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→To do) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Isn't the unidentified individual Bagget? It really can't be anyone else. [[User:FalseSwipe|FalseSwipe]] 04:04, 30 May 2009 (CEST) | : Isn't the unidentified individual Bagget? It really can't be anyone else. [[User:FalseSwipe|FalseSwipe]] 04:04, 30 May 2009 (CEST) | ||
*There's also been several places where he discusses the "fucked up law" like on his Wikipedia page and in various ED edits, it might be worth mentioning as well and a bit more depth about how Chris thinks there's an active conspiracy to forbid him from getting laid. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:43, 19 June 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 06:43, 19 June 2009
To do
- add Chris's fake ad for "Virginia is for Virgins"
- I believe Chris commented somewhere how he get the idea from the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign (well, it's obvious the inspiration, but it's amusing that he explains it). I believe it was in a MySpace entry, maybe it's in Other, I need to check or someone else can. --Champthom 14:37, 11 March 2009 (CET)
- Chris uses two forms of the phrase. The longer version is "Virginia is for Virgins; not Lovers," so the reference he's making is so obvious that even he probably doesn't think he needs to explain it. --MachPunch 00:39, 12 March 2009 (CET)
- Isn't the unidentified individual Bagget? It really can't be anyone else. FalseSwipe 04:04, 30 May 2009 (CEST)
- There's also been several places where he discusses the "fucked up law" like on his Wikipedia page and in various ED edits, it might be worth mentioning as well and a bit more depth about how Chris thinks there's an active conspiracy to forbid him from getting laid. --Champthom 12:43, 19 June 2009 (CEST)