Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedofork"
m |
m (Suggestion for section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:*Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST) | :*Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST) | ||
EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST) | EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST) | ||
Should this page have a "Usage by Chris" and "Other references" with instances of pedofork being used? [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 00:05, 27 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:05, 27 April 2011
"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. Ayvuir 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
- I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. SirCucumber 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
- Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --DStecks 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --Champthom 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)
Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --GokuGetEm 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- I honestly think it might just be a co-incindence. --DStecks 02:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Get rid of the stupid shit on this page already. -- Clyde 02:01, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
- Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". CrassCrab 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST)
EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. CrassCrab 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST)
Should this page have a "Usage by Chris" and "Other references" with instances of pedofork being used? Nullity 00:05, 27 April 2011 (PDT)