Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mimms and Lucas Q&A"
Jack Kelso (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Holy shit...== | ==Holy shit...== | ||
Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question. | Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question. | ||
*1) sign your posts (it's four ~s in a row), 2) this isn't the place to discuss the content of the Q&A, 3) be damn grateful they even answered them. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 04:38, 28 June 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:38, 28 June 2011
Clyde talked about being willing to post these here on CWCki since there's some Krapplefags who want to join PVCC just to see this thread. Personally I've been meaning to do this but I've been kinda lazy to do so.
On a related note, we need a category like "Primary sources" for stuff like this, like stuff about Chris from people who have had direct contact with him but not actually Chris (like Tale of the Crazy Pacer).--Champthom 15:20, 17 October 2009 (CEST)
- How about "Eyewitness Accounts"? I'll start categorizing things. Ayvuir 18:47, 17 October 2009 (CEST)
- yeah, a lot of other shit came up though so...someone else doing it would be great! Clydec 19:49, 17 October 2009 (CEST)
- This is awesome. Keep them coming. --AntonImausMk2 23:46, 1 December 2009 (CET)
I'M ONLY HALF A YEAR LATE ON WORKING ON THIS! GO ME. will finish later Clydec 18:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- there, fucking finished Clydec 18:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Tito?
This may explain why Chris assumed he knew who Surfshack Tito was.--MoarLurk 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Shitcunt. I was just coming here to point that out. But yeah, that may explain some things. -Borednewb 01:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
To do
Needs to be subdivided so people can cite individual posts easier.--Champthom 05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- In the process, d'you think it would be better to re-arrange the questions so similar subjects (like his behavior around Megan) are grouped together, or would you rather keep them in the current (I guess chronological?) order? Dkaien 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Subject would probably be best, I don't think chronology plays a big role in these posts. --Champthom 07:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I rearranged them to fit stuff together by subject and added more headings. Some of the big lists of questions I broke up to move different ones around to the right subject heading, hope that was okay. Obviously if folks think there should be more subject headings or if stuff should be moved around or the formatting needs changing, fine by me. Dkaien 03:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Holy shit...
Is everyone in Virginia as illiterate as these two and Chris? And its tres annoying how these teo seem to answer a question without actuslly answering the damn question.
- 1) sign your posts (it's four ~s in a row), 2) this isn't the place to discuss the content of the Q&A, 3) be damn grateful they even answered them. --Champthom 04:38, 28 June 2011 (PDT)