Difference between revisions of "User talk:Megaman"
m (1 revision) |
(→Style guide: new section) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Anna McLerran== | ==Anna McLerran== | ||
See the talk page. tl;dr is that you were trying to hard and your more inflammatory language didn't notice that it was Anna who actually wrote that, which is a valuable addition to the article. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:50, 7 December 2009 (CET) | See the talk page. tl;dr is that you were trying to hard and your more inflammatory language didn't notice that it was Anna who actually wrote that, which is a valuable addition to the article. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:50, 7 December 2009 (CET) | ||
== Style guide == | |||
Well Megaman, I still think it's silly that you are expected to represent every discontent on PVCC when really they should be editing the CWCki themselves. I also disagree with some of your other views. However, I admire that you're actually doing what I've been saying and contributing to the CWCki and I salute you for that. | |||
So I will offer you what I offered Clyde - you can write the [[CWCki:Style|entire Style guide]], obviously focusing on things articles should and shouldn't address and ideally trying to find edits that exemplify good and bad kinds of edits. Perhaps you're better able to distill their discontent into a workable guideline for writing articles than I can. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:06, 21 September 2011 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:06, 21 September 2011
Jo
Did you find that wikipedia-page? :o RachmaninovDESU 14:04, 3 May 2009 (CEST)
No I didn't. Although I mentioned it on the forums, I forgot to note it in the actual article. I'll put a note crediting falsion with the find. I OKed it Cog before putting the page up --Megaman 14:36, 3 May 2009 (CEST)
- Don't worry man, it's still an epic article. But I thought that if you found it you should be crowed to high-prince or something. ^^ Srsly, this could have escaped our notice very easily... RachmaninovDESU 15:10, 3 May 2009 (CEST)
Deletion
Sorry if I was a bit abrupt, but this was suppose to be SUPER SEKKRIT so Chris could do his own thing. I was not aware Chris finally finished the article. Fortunately, turns out they only deleted the user page and not ban him. So far he's made some edits to "high functioning autism" which have been lulzy (adding himself to the list of famous people with autism) and I hope this goes on. --Champthom 17:13, 3 May 2009 (CEST)
Emily first date
- Just so you know, that mail voice wasn't Clyde, that was the JEW MAN IN THE PICKLE SUIT who TRICKED CHRIS AGAIN. --Champthom 23:14, 8 May 2009 (CEST)
- I was just talking to Pod in IRC about this, I'm working on the audio transcript and he corrected me, I'll be changing it to reflect is suggestions --Megaman 23:17, 8 May 2009 (CEST)
- If the font coloring is taking you longer than it should (transcribing that shit takes long enough), I can do it in one fell swoop at the end. But if not, then ignore this. Axe 08:04, 10 May 2009 (CEST)
- Nope all the font coloring is copy and pasted with the name of the person saying the line. The problem is that it's 90 minutes of audio, and I'm doing little pieces at a time. I've already got a few people helping me on it, but they're mostly for fact checking. Thanks for offering though. --Megaman 10:58, 10 May 2009 (CEST)
Welcome?
Why are you "welcoming" me to CWCki? I've already been editing here for over two months, which is only a couple weeks less time than you've been here. Moreover, I've already made more than 600 edits (many of them substantial), which I'd estimate to be about twice as many edits as you've made. You're obviously trying to be friendly, but you're going about it in entirely the wrong way. Llort 15:02, 28 July 2009 (CEST)
:o
User:__/Sandbox was my original creation © ;)
- Shit, my bad for not signing. And sure, I'll help you out if I can --Great Briton 19:01, 29 July 2009 (CEST)
Rule 34
Some of us managed to find most of the lost pages from sonichu 8. Where do you recommend that I upload this? I don't know if cogs can put up a mirror, or if we want to include this in the comics. Either way, I've got most of them, if not all of them. Let me know how we should do this. --Decrumpit 05:35, 30 July 2009 (CEST)
A clarification
The SoulCalibur character image I uploaded was "fan art" of sorts. I'm sorry I wasn't clearer about this; I shouldn't upload stuff when I'm dead tired and subsequently suck at writing descriptions. But I do hope someone can get Chris to post screenshots of his SC3 creations =) --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 11:18, 31 July 2009 (CEST)
Anna McLerran
See the talk page. tl;dr is that you were trying to hard and your more inflammatory language didn't notice that it was Anna who actually wrote that, which is a valuable addition to the article. --Champthom 12:50, 7 December 2009 (CET)
Style guide
Well Megaman, I still think it's silly that you are expected to represent every discontent on PVCC when really they should be editing the CWCki themselves. I also disagree with some of your other views. However, I admire that you're actually doing what I've been saying and contributing to the CWCki and I salute you for that.
So I will offer you what I offered Clyde - you can write the entire Style guide, obviously focusing on things articles should and shouldn't address and ideally trying to find edits that exemplify good and bad kinds of edits. Perhaps you're better able to distill their discontent into a workable guideline for writing articles than I can. --Champthom 08:06, 21 September 2011 (PDT)