Difference between revisions of "Talk:Camerawork"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Chris and camerawork to Talk:Camerawork: Folks seem to think that a better title is better and not everything has to be Chris And.) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 16:29, 6 March 2010
I don't think this page exists yet
I looked, and saw nothing about Chris's actually camerawork, so I started it up--Toughdog6789 05:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- The "Chris And" designation is for large, broad concepts, like religion, language, government etc. This should be titled camerawork. That said, I'm not sure enough can be said about Chris's camerawork to merit a full article.
- Do we have an article that covers the utterly incompetent way Chris makes videos? This would fit in there perfectly. --Beat 06:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, we don't have something like that. Might wanna put it in the YouTube article, though. Seriously, the guy has videos up the ying-yang on YT and they haven't been really talked about.--Blazer 06:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone for merging this with the Youtube article?--Hieghts503 1:22 15 Febuary 2010 (CET)
- I was about to make "Chris and photography", but I was not sure of the title. I think "Camerawork" is good, because Chris fails on both motion picture and still picture endeavours... and not only on YouTube, but all other mediums he has managed to spew videos upon, starting from GameBoy Camera to home videos to DVDs. --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 21:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)