Talk:Jackie

tl;dr: This woman decided to contact us and wants to tell other women not to go out with chris. she doesn't know how the wiki shit works so just like...i'm handling it for now. so yeah. okay. Clydec 04:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

and apparently now she's back with chris for some reason. Clydec 14:35, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

I'm assuming this is the same woman as in the Jackie e-mails, right? - Boop 15:24, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

Wasn't the Jackie page deleted sometime ago between the 6th and now while we were trying to figure it out. Or am I forgetting the origonal name? --SerenityMoonstone 21:37, 13 September 2010.

I thought that listing the last name was a no-no after the Wallflower incident. Is this something that should be taken out or are we going to leave it up this time? --Caboose -1 19:10, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

You have to remember that The Wallflower herself requested to take her name down of the site - all the other names e.g. Megan Schroeder are still there --Maximilian Graves 19:14, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

STOP BEING RETARDS

Damn slow-in-the-minds. --Sonijew is back 09:52, 17 September 2010 (PDT)

• Seconded. --Scruffy Clyde

Typo/Error?

"Furthermore, he uploaded a ModNation character generically named 'Sweetheart', which was discussed to be another Chloe or Wallflower."

Shouldn't it be Lovely Weather instead of The Wallflower, since The Wallflower actually turned out to exist? -Dillon627 18:09, 13 October 2010 (PDT)

• I think what they meant by Wallflower is that the sweetheart is someone Chris thinks he's dating. It looks fine to me. --MissRadioactive 23:00, 13 October 2010 (PDT)

Jackie's Hooke Cafe profile

Is the whole copy of her profile really necessary, I think we should take it down and give the abridged version (just the facts that relate to chris)--CaseHa 10:21, 28 October 2010 (PDT)

Yes it is necessary. --Anonymax 12:30, 28 October 2010 (PDT)

Status of Relationship

So, it seems that they've broken up, with Chris LEAVAN INTERNETS and the pleading video about her not leaving him, but the reasons are still unclear. Maybe we should put up a detail about the end of this relationship for some clarity? Until we get some more evidence, that is. PerilousSquall 07:43, 25 November 2010 (PST)

• Nevermind, Jackie is awesome. PerilousSquall 05:18, 3 December 2010 (PST)

• The REAL Jackie is awesome. Not the troll Jackie. And I know what you're asking: "Wait, Jackie was a troll?" Well, yes and no. For the beginning of the relationship she was real, but from September on, a troll by the name of "Ofoosy" posed as Jackie and bribed Chris to make videos with Porn Pictures of Jackie (as she is apparently a porn star...((from what he told me))) and of other women...as Chris has no sense of facial recognition. Ofoosy broke the relationship off because he was either bored or it was his indulgence in pot that made him lose his persistance to keep torturing Chris. I also have more information about Ofoosy, if anyone is interested. I'm not making this up at all. I saw this fold out from September on. The only proof I have is my word.

                                Etoxic 20:46, 7 December 2010 (PST)

• • I don't believe a word of this. Sorry. From my lofty, knowledgeable perch as a basement dwelling fuckhead I'm FAIRLY sure that porn stars don't have to advertise on personal sites, and if they did, they wouldn't use pictures that are part of their regular porn portfolios (and, thus, making their profession easily discoverable). And if they DID, they wouldn't be interested in fat gay truckers with acne scarring like they were in some kind of war. And if they WERE, one look at that comic and they'd run screaming since they're human beings and no human being likes Sonichu. And if even if she WAS into... etc etc. Sorry, there's just no way that Jackie was anything other than 100% troll from the get-go. --Ronichu 23:56, 7 December 2010 (PST)
    • EVEN IF all this was true, there's no sauces at all. So it's not verifiable. It's speculation at best. --Ronichu 23:58, 7 December 2010 (PST)
      • Ronichu is absolutely right. Of course she was a troll, I mean could it be any more obvious? Looking at the mails and chats it's safe to say that Jackie didn't behave like a sane human when interacting with Chris. After writing your little story, you tell us the only proof we have is your word? Oh wow. Around here, that means even less than elsewhere. You know what, I'm the real Sonichu, I came to life and fled from my creator. I swear by god, that I'm not an atheist and this is all true! --Sonichu 15:33, 8 December 2010 (PST)

Guise, why so critical? This sounds perfectly reasonable to me. You're just being Oppressive and Racist Against Legitimate truth. I think we should at least listen to this Potentially IMportant Person so that we can confirm the Honesty of Our Shit. Please proceed, Etoxic. Freecell 19:06, 8 December 2010 (PST)

• Freecell is absolutely right. By all means proceed. I'd love to read some stories while Chris is away. --Sonichu 07:24, 9 December 2010 (PST)
  • I always wondered if Jackie was for real or if she was a troll posing as a sexy, cute sweetie named Jackie. Lelouch Vi Britannia 20:10, 22 September 2011 (PDT)
    • These guys will fill you in. Also, make sure your comments go AFTER peoples' timestamps kthx Freecell (t/c) 03:16, 23 September 2011 (PDT)

Source of Jackie's picture

I have found an additional, nude picture of "Jackie", available here. However, reverse-image-searching with Google provides no conclusive results. According to TinEye, both pictures date to late 2011 at the earliest. Anyone know anything?