Difference between revisions of "File talk:Screen shot 2011-08-10 at 10.01.05 PM.png"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
IwegalBadnik (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::"If the results from the ELA tool show an image which is all bright, it does not indicate that a photo has been manipulated (quite the opposite actually). What does indicate manipulation, is different levels of brightness throughout the image. If certain sections of the image have noticeably different levels of brightness, it is a strong indicator for further investigation." [[User:CompyRex|CompyRex]] 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT) | :::"If the results from the ELA tool show an image which is all bright, it does not indicate that a photo has been manipulated (quite the opposite actually). What does indicate manipulation, is different levels of brightness throughout the image. If certain sections of the image have noticeably different levels of brightness, it is a strong indicator for further investigation." [[User:CompyRex|CompyRex]] 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
::::That tool is only applicable to JPEG images that are resaved over and over, using deterioration from lossy compression. This image is a PNG with mostly text, with lossless compression. The algorithm doesn't apply to it. - [[User:LucidFox|LucidFox]] 21:38, 13 August 2011 (PDT) | ::::That tool is only applicable to JPEG images that are resaved over and over, using deterioration from lossy compression. This image is a PNG with mostly text, with lossless compression. The algorithm doesn't apply to it. - [[User:LucidFox|LucidFox]] 21:38, 13 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
:::::To me this looks genuine. However, one thing that I did see that could indicate a forgery was the period following his name at the bottom. Anyone whose taken a kindergarten level English writing class knows you do not use punctuation behind a name in this manner; unless denoting a rank or abbreviation. Obviously, no such titles accompany Chris' name. Perhaps its a forgery, perhaps not. --[[User:IwegalBadnik|IwegalBadnik]] 21:54, 13 August 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:54, 14 August 2011
Submitted for your approval: http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/328029a/
- Very pretty...but I don't know what it means. --4Macie 20:32, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- I think it suggests that parts of it, like the ChristianWChandler username, are photoshopped, but that's just what it looks like after looking another shopped picture on that site. But I don't know for sure. CompyRex 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- "If the results from the ELA tool show an image which is all bright, it does not indicate that a photo has been manipulated (quite the opposite actually). What does indicate manipulation, is different levels of brightness throughout the image. If certain sections of the image have noticeably different levels of brightness, it is a strong indicator for further investigation." CompyRex 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- That tool is only applicable to JPEG images that are resaved over and over, using deterioration from lossy compression. This image is a PNG with mostly text, with lossless compression. The algorithm doesn't apply to it. - LucidFox 21:38, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- To me this looks genuine. However, one thing that I did see that could indicate a forgery was the period following his name at the bottom. Anyone whose taken a kindergarten level English writing class knows you do not use punctuation behind a name in this manner; unless denoting a rank or abbreviation. Obviously, no such titles accompany Chris' name. Perhaps its a forgery, perhaps not. --IwegalBadnik 21:54, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- That tool is only applicable to JPEG images that are resaved over and over, using deterioration from lossy compression. This image is a PNG with mostly text, with lossless compression. The algorithm doesn't apply to it. - LucidFox 21:38, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- "If the results from the ELA tool show an image which is all bright, it does not indicate that a photo has been manipulated (quite the opposite actually). What does indicate manipulation, is different levels of brightness throughout the image. If certain sections of the image have noticeably different levels of brightness, it is a strong indicator for further investigation." CompyRex 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
- I think it suggests that parts of it, like the ChristianWChandler username, are photoshopped, but that's just what it looks like after looking another shopped picture on that site. But I don't know for sure. CompyRex 20:37, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
