Difference between revisions of "Talk:14 Branchland Court"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:*I think that this article is already a little bit too long, and adding two videos to it would only make it even longer. Yes, having the videos here would be illustrative, but it would also be redundant. Anyone who comes here and wants to watch the videos has a huge link to the videos' own page staring them in the face, so I don't see why they can't just go there. Lastly, if the videos were to remain double-posted here, I'm sure that someone would eventually start complaining that there were no transcripts (or else start needlessly re-transcribing them). Can't we just opt to avoid all of that Stressful Torture? [[User:Llort|Llort]] 02:23, 22 June 2009 (CEST) | :*I think that this article is already a little bit too long, and adding two videos to it would only make it even longer. Yes, having the videos here would be illustrative, but it would also be redundant. Anyone who comes here and wants to watch the videos has a huge link to the videos' own page staring them in the face, so I don't see why they can't just go there. Lastly, if the videos were to remain double-posted here, I'm sure that someone would eventually start complaining that there were no transcripts (or else start needlessly re-transcribing them). Can't we just opt to avoid all of that Stressful Torture? [[User:Llort|Llort]] 02:23, 22 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
** I guess. It just seems that having the two vids on the page, while redundant, makes it much more efficient. You wanna see the videos themselves and the descriptions/analysis? See the Branchland Court article. Want the vids and a transcript? See the main article. Maybe add such a description to the link to the video article? --[[User:Tregnier2795|Tregnier2795]] 10:51, 23 June 2009 (CEST) | ** I guess. It just seems that having the two vids on the page, while redundant, makes it much more efficient. You wanna see the videos themselves and the descriptions/analysis? See the Branchland Court article. Want the vids and a transcript? See the main article. Maybe add such a description to the link to the video article? --[[User:Tregnier2795|Tregnier2795]] 10:51, 23 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
==Question== | |||
I've heard that Chris waits by the mail box daily to intercept mail from his parents incase any new NOODS arrive for them, is there any substance to that claim?--[[User:UncleBastard|UncleBastard]] 00:21, 23 July 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 18:21, 22 July 2009
Should the videos be posted here or only on the main article? I think they should be posted on both, and this page should link back to the original. What say ye? --Tregnier2795 01:25, 22 June 2009 (CEST)
- I think that this article is already a little bit too long, and adding two videos to it would only make it even longer. Yes, having the videos here would be illustrative, but it would also be redundant. Anyone who comes here and wants to watch the videos has a huge link to the videos' own page staring them in the face, so I don't see why they can't just go there. Lastly, if the videos were to remain double-posted here, I'm sure that someone would eventually start complaining that there were no transcripts (or else start needlessly re-transcribing them). Can't we just opt to avoid all of that Stressful Torture? Llort 02:23, 22 June 2009 (CEST)
- I guess. It just seems that having the two vids on the page, while redundant, makes it much more efficient. You wanna see the videos themselves and the descriptions/analysis? See the Branchland Court article. Want the vids and a transcript? See the main article. Maybe add such a description to the link to the video article? --Tregnier2795 10:51, 23 June 2009 (CEST)
Question
I've heard that Chris waits by the mail box daily to intercept mail from his parents incase any new NOODS arrive for them, is there any substance to that claim?--UncleBastard 00:21, 23 July 2009 (CEST)