Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and gender"
Skurvypete (talk | contribs) |
Skurvypete (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes|asperhes]], 4/5/15 | Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?[[User:Asperhes|asperhes]], 4/5/15 | ||
I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe from existence. [[User:skurvypete]],4/5/15 | I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. [[User:skurvypete|Skurvypete]],4/5/15 | ||
Revision as of 00:04, 6 April 2015
Is this necessary?
We've already got pages on Chris and sex, the Tomgirl saga, and homos. The page on JERKS already says everything about what Chris thinks about men. All these pages already deal with gender in some fashion. While I think it would be a good idea to have the issue of gender addressed in a centralized place, why not just restructure one of these other pages? There's already a "Chris and transgender issues" section on the Homos page.
What's more, the discussions on the Forum indicate that there is a huge debate about Chris and gender which make this a difficult issue to tackle objectively. One of the central rules of the CWCki is to avoid speculation. Chris hasn't received a psychological evaluation on this issue. So far this article has no citations. I am not optimistic about this page not descending into a useless clusterfuck.
Finally, the "Chris and..." pages are high-profile, and I believe require (or should require) admin approval. Why not create this as an experimental page for now on your userpage, and see what the mods think of it?asperhes, 4/5/15
I understand and appreciate your critical analysis. I saw this article as requested and tried to put as much in as I can at this time. As you can see this article is far from finished and greatly appreciate contributions to the article. I will try to moderate the page as much as possible. If it does devolve to what you fear then I will gladly wipe it from existence.Also if the admins find it in any way unneeded or innapropiate I will delete it. Skurvypete,4/5/15