Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patti Chandler"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
is there any call for expansion of this article? i was considering trying to incorporate some current research on the relationship between autistic children and pet dogs but i don't know if there is really any point in doing so. relevant or no? -[[User:Phlegethon|Phlegethon]] 23:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
is there any call for expansion of this article? i was considering trying to incorporate some current research on the relationship between autistic children and pet dogs but i don't know if there is really any point in doing so. relevant or no? -[[User:Phlegethon|Phlegethon]] 23:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
: If you can use it as an example of his disconnection with Humans, I'd say go for it.  Depending on where you're going, I'd say it's worth a mention.  The whole point is if it's interesting or insightful, it should be up.  I think so, at least, but what do I know? [[User:CDiddles|CDiddles]] 00:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
==To do==
==To do==
*Add picture, real and from comic
*Add picture, real and from comic

Revision as of 20:11, 26 January 2010

is there any call for expansion of this article? i was considering trying to incorporate some current research on the relationship between autistic children and pet dogs but i don't know if there is really any point in doing so. relevant or no? -Phlegethon 23:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

If you can use it as an example of his disconnection with Humans, I'd say go for it. Depending on where you're going, I'd say it's worth a mention. The whole point is if it's interesting or insightful, it should be up. I think so, at least, but what do I know? CDiddles 00:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

To do

  • Add picture, real and from comic
  • Powers in comics
  • Role in comic

Merged

I think this could be merged with the article Patti-chan. When I created the article, I was also going to include Patti-chan here but I guess someone else had other ideas. Any thoughts? --Champthom 00:29, 14 February 2009 (CET)

Well they're really seperate, it's like merging Chris-chan with chris chan sonichu Etc. I think they're different enough to be kept their own articles.--UncleBastard 01:01, 14 February 2009 (CET)
I like that there are two separate articles, but they're both so short it seems silly not to combine them. Patti-Chan's a bit player in the comics as it is, while the real Patti is dead, so there's never really gonna be anything new to cover. Dethchemist77 02:57, 14 February 2009 (CET)
Short of Chris digging the corpse up and re-animating it using Technix lego and pixel blocks. Which wouldn't surprise me if he did. :D--UncleBastard 04:41, 14 February 2009 (CET)
In theory, we could always get more info about Patti Chandler the real dog but IMHO, there's far lulzier things to aim for and in any case, I think all of it can easily fit in one article. --Champthom 05:00, 14 February 2009 (CET)

Nightmare Fuel

Does anyone else suspect that ol' Chrissy fucked the dog? I wouldn't put it passed him.

  • I'd like to say no, only because I think that dog had a poor enough time just hanging around with him. But, considering how he drew his saying goodbye to her in the comic... Dammerung
  • If that were the case, then Chris wouldn't be the "virgin with rage" we all know and despise today. Unless he only conisdered her to be a ...O_O...Nevermind ._." EdtheHedgehog1894


by the way she was delicious

Clydec 01:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)