Difference between revisions of "User talk:DawnDusk"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(He's Dead, Jim.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:09, 21 September 2011

He's Dead, Jim.

It was decided that the Bob article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --Anonymax 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)

I refer you to this edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. --Anonymax 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)