Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jerkop"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
== Under Watch Template ==
== Under Watch Template ==


Unless Champ or cogs told you to take that down it should probably be reinstated as it existed for a reason: To mark people (mainly asperpedians) who were potentially going to make an issue with our current guest you know who. [[User:DrShoggoth|DrShoggoth]] 06:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Unless Champ or cogs told you to take that down it should probably be reinstated as it existed for a reason: To mark people (mainly asperpedians) who were potentially going to make an issue with the current operation. [[User:DrShoggoth|DrShoggoth]] 06:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
*I personally think it was causing unnecessary drama that could have compromised the operation.  Oh, and I intend to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain from now on, I apologize for misunderstanding the instruction, it won't happen again.--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 06:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:27, 12 July 2010

You're a jerkop

I figure with a name like yours, you'd be the ideal candidate for one. So yeah, go forth, stop vandalism, and don't abuse your powers for personal gain. --Champthom 20:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks! And don't worry, I'm not going to abuse anything.--Jerkop 20:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Contact me ASAP

This is URGENT. --Champthom 02:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Please IM me

Champ told me to contact you and the other Jerkops. My AIM is LittleLazyLime. --Lime 05:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Under Watch Template

Unless Champ or cogs told you to take that down it should probably be reinstated as it existed for a reason: To mark people (mainly asperpedians) who were potentially going to make an issue with the current operation. DrShoggoth 06:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

  • I personally think it was causing unnecessary drama that could have compromised the operation. Oh, and I intend to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain from now on, I apologize for misunderstanding the instruction, it won't happen again.--MoarLurk 06:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)