Difference between revisions of "Talk:Common Questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Looks redundant for me. It would make a nice sub-section to Question For Chris. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 04:47, 29 December 2009 (CET) | :Looks redundant for me. It would make a nice sub-section to Question For Chris. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 04:47, 29 December 2009 (CET) | ||
::Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET) | ::Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET) | ||
:::I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 00:57, 29 December 2009
Should this be linked to Questions for Chris or should this get its own page? It seems like it will be a recurring feature. Thoughts? --Champthom 02:50, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Looks redundant for me. It would make a nice sub-section to Question For Chris. Griffintown 04:47, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. Griffintown 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)