Difference between revisions of "Talk:Common Questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (10 revisions) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 03:42, 3 January 2010
Should this be linked to Questions for Chris or should this get its own page? It seems like it will be a recurring feature. Thoughts? --Champthom 02:50, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Looks redundant for me. It would make a nice sub-section to Question For Chris. Griffintown 04:47, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. Griffintown 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- i could put a picture of my dick on cwcipedia so it becomes bona-fide. but yeah, right now i'm just stealing all the questions from that page for now. soon, i'll throw some of the mailbag in there as well while the major e-mails get put into the mailbags. so this might become the new mailbag. or something. Clydec 05:59, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Please warn me the day you will post your Bona-Fide Phallus on CWCipedia; I want to do a screen capture of it. :D This being said, I love the Mailbag format and These questions would fit in it easily. Griffintown 07:00, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- i could put a picture of my dick on cwcipedia so it becomes bona-fide. but yeah, right now i'm just stealing all the questions from that page for now. soon, i'll throw some of the mailbag in there as well while the major e-mails get put into the mailbags. so this might become the new mailbag. or something. Clydec 05:59, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. Griffintown 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)
Why not Using the Mailbag Format?
I mean, why not? Chris is answering questions from the public and the said answers are not that longer than the conventional mailbag. Besides, Black on White Q&A is quite hard on the eyes to read. Another arguement; there's no clutter of answers everywhere. These bit-sized pieces of text would be easier to quote and link that way. Griffintown
- I'm sorry man, I just can't agree with you on this one. The Big boxes take up too much space and are visually distracting for these single-line questions and answers. They look fine when you're doing huge mailbag things, but here they just look off.
- There's nothing preventing us from using the format seen on the Questions for Chris page. I've personally never found the black and quite Q&A hard to read, and honestly, if you find it hard on your eyes, maybe you should consider scaling up the font size in your browser.--Beat 08:48, 31 December 2009 (CET)