Difference between revisions of "Talk:9/11"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: Is this really worth a page to itself? I mean, 911 already links to the Twin Towers video, and the article Chris and Death has a section for the attacks... I don't know if this is real...)
 
m (3 revisions)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Is this really worth a page to itself? I mean, 911 already links to the Twin Towers video, and the article [[Chris and Death]] has a section for the attacks... I don't know if this is really worth an article by itself. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 03:17, 26 November 2009 (CET)
Is this really worth a page to itself? I mean, 911 already links to the Twin Towers video, and the article [[Chris and death]] has a section for the attacks... I don't know if this is really worth an article by itself. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 03:17, 26 November 2009 (CET)
 
*I agree.  There's no real need for this page.  --[[User:Sack Thaddic|Sack Thaddic]] 06:55, 26 November 2009 (CET)

Latest revision as of 03:58, 3 January 2010

Is this really worth a page to itself? I mean, 911 already links to the Twin Towers video, and the article Chris and death has a section for the attacks... I don't know if this is really worth an article by itself. SirCucumber 03:17, 26 November 2009 (CET)

  • I agree. There's no real need for this page. --Sack Thaddic 06:55, 26 November 2009 (CET)