Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Chris and"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
== Guidelines ==
== Guidelines ==


I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]]18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
:These are excellent guidelines.  That said your sig doesn't include your name so I have no idea who you are.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
:These are excellent guidelines.  That said your sig doesn't include your name so I have no idea who you are.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
::That happens if I type 5 ~'s instead of 4 :-/ --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 18:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:05, 22 May 2010

We need "Chris and Reliability" --CJB8895

  • I'm sure that, if we asked him, he'd agree to make it for us later. --Tristran 02:46, 9 December 2009 (CET)

Guidelines

I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --Anonymax18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

These are excellent guidelines. That said your sig doesn't include your name so I have no idea who you are.--Beat 18:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
That happens if I type 5 ~'s instead of 4 :-/ --Anonymax 18:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)