Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sonichu 0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sonichu site: new section) |
(→Sonichu site: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page. --[[User:Dude|Dude]] 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET) | Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page. --[[User:Dude|Dude]] 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET) | ||
== Sonichu site == | |||
For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Sonichu site == | == Sonichu site == | ||
For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 2 June 2010
To do:
- Edit synopis for each episode, add more commentary.
- Scrape more Issue 0 pics into gallery (there's a lot in other articles)
Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page. --Dude 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET)
Sonichu site
For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all. --BreadGod 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Sonichu site
For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all. --BreadGod 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)