Difference between revisions of "User talk:Enibure"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Sup. [[User:Blotto|Blotto]] 15:44, 9 February 2011 (PST) | Sup. [[User:Blotto|Blotto]] 15:44, 9 February 2011 (PST) | ||
== Yo == | |||
ADF forum securitate plz, etc. Also random fags on dA may be easily ADF agents, so this defeats the purpose - just the CWCki regulars. --[[User:Sonijew is back|Sonijew is back]] 00:35, 11 February 2011 (PST) | |||
*Sorted. And my thinking was that if a /cwc/ reg. or whatever didn't have a CWCki account for whatever reason but had been uploading shit onto dA for a few years with no contact with ADF, it would be enough to verify that they weren't a sock. That's not happened yet though, so I guess we'll see how well it works, maybe... [[User:Enibure|Enibure]] 00:44, 11 February 2011 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 03:44, 11 February 2011
Well I transcribed 2 videos tonight only to find out someone else had...because no one typed transcribe into the discussion box. I'm not pissed at you...I'm pissed that "transcribing" wasn't written in the discussion.--Lylelash 17:00, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
It's cool mate, just merge 'em. No big deal, yeah?Enibure 17:13, 7 October 2010 (PDT)
Yeah no big deal...I merged the parts you didn't have with what I had...lol, cheers.
something--Wintermute 15:12, 9 February 2011 (PST)
Something else. --Schuzrum Dias 15:38, 9 February 2011 (PST)
Sup. Blotto 15:44, 9 February 2011 (PST)
Yo
ADF forum securitate plz, etc. Also random fags on dA may be easily ADF agents, so this defeats the purpose - just the CWCki regulars. --Sonijew is back 00:35, 11 February 2011 (PST)
- Sorted. And my thinking was that if a /cwc/ reg. or whatever didn't have a CWCki account for whatever reason but had been uploading shit onto dA for a few years with no contact with ADF, it would be enough to verify that they weren't a sock. That's not happened yet though, so I guess we'll see how well it works, maybe... Enibure 00:44, 11 February 2011 (PST)