Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Illustrations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (5 revisions) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I'd still suggest "original illustrations" rather than "original content". Text can be content, too, you know --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 11:33, 1 December 2009 (CET) | I'd still suggest "original illustrations" rather than "original content". Text can be content, too, you know --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 11:33, 1 December 2009 (CET) | ||
*Or maybe, "needs some drawfaggotry"? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 11:36, 1 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:29, 3 January 2010
We already have a template like this, we just need to find it. It's pinkish and has Shecameforcwc on it. --Champthom 11:18, 1 December 2009 (CET)
- Hmm, yeah, you're right. But it's asking for inserting Chris's drawings only --GokuGetEm 11:22, 1 December 2009 (CET)
.JPG)
|
This article is boring and needs more images. Make it better by inserting some of Chris's shitty drawings. |
I'd still suggest "original illustrations" rather than "original content". Text can be content, too, you know --GokuGetEm 11:33, 1 December 2009 (CET)
- Or maybe, "needs some drawfaggotry"? --GokuGetEm 11:36, 1 December 2009 (CET)