Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Annotated Sonichu"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Second, there's no link to the blog itself on the page. [[User:Nate-Kar Sonichu|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Nate-Kar Sonichu|talk]]) 22:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC) | Second, there's no link to the blog itself on the page. [[User:Nate-Kar Sonichu|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Nate-Kar Sonichu|talk]]) 22:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
*I actually disagree, I think it's an interesting extended critical read on the series. As the article says, it's an in-depth and unusually neutral take. [[User:Happilymerried|Happilymerried]] ([[User talk:Happilymerried|talk]]) 05:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC) | *I actually disagree, I think it's an interesting extended critical read on the series. As the article says, it's an in-depth and unusually neutral take. [[User:Happilymerried|Happilymerried]] ([[User talk:Happilymerried|talk]]) 05:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
** We should still have a link to the blog on the page itself if we're going to keep this. [[User:Nate-Kar Sonichu|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Nate-Kar Sonichu|talk]]) 02:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:44, 26 October 2016
Notability and Links
First, is this page really necessary? I remember reading and enjoying the blog but it is canceled rather early in the comic series and Chris didn't interact with it to my knowledge.
Second, there's no link to the blog itself on the page. Nathan (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- I actually disagree, I think it's an interesting extended critical read on the series. As the article says, it's an in-depth and unusually neutral take. Happilymerried (talk) 05:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)