Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jackie"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:


Wasn't the Jackie page deleted sometime ago between the 6th and now while we were trying to figure it out. Or am I forgetting the origonal name? --[[User:SerenityMoonstone|SerenityMoonstone]] 21:37, 13 September 2010.
Wasn't the Jackie page deleted sometime ago between the 6th and now while we were trying to figure it out. Or am I forgetting the origonal name? --[[User:SerenityMoonstone|SerenityMoonstone]] 21:37, 13 September 2010.
I thought that listing the last name was a no-no after the Wallflower incident.  Is this something that should be taken out or are we going to leave it up this time?  --[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 19:10, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

Revision as of 21:10, 13 September 2010

tl;dr: This woman decided to contact us and wants to tell other women not to go out with chris. she doesn't know how the wiki shit works so just like...i'm handling it for now. so yeah. okay. Clydec 04:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

and apparently now she's back with chris for some reason. Clydec 14:35, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

  • I'm assuming this is the same woman as in the Jackie e-mails, right? - Boop 15:24, 13 September 2010 (PDT)

Wasn't the Jackie page deleted sometime ago between the 6th and now while we were trying to figure it out. Or am I forgetting the origonal name? --SerenityMoonstone 21:37, 13 September 2010.

I thought that listing the last name was a no-no after the Wallflower incident. Is this something that should be taken out or are we going to leave it up this time? --Caboose -1 19:10, 13 September 2010 (PDT)