Difference between revisions of "Talk:BlueSpike Skype Logs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
KataclysmKat (talk | contribs) |
KataclysmKat (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Do we want short summaries at the top of the pages? Many of these conversations are long... [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 10:03, 13 October 2010 (PDT) | Do we want short summaries at the top of the pages? Many of these conversations are long... [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 10:03, 13 October 2010 (PDT) | ||
*Good thinking there, partner. Let's fund it. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 10:22, 13 October 2010 (PDT) | *Good thinking there, partner. Let's fund it. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 10:22, 13 October 2010 (PDT) | ||
*I've tried to do some summaries/synopses for the first three chats. I realize they might be too long, in which case someone can edit them. | *I've tried to do some summaries/synopses for the first three chats. I realize they might be too long, in which case someone can edit them. --[[User:KataclysmKat|KataclysmKat]] 1:50, 05 February 2011 | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 5 February 2011
To do
- format
- split the logs up more reasonably
Clydec 19:16, 11 October 2010 (PDT)
- This article looks like shit. I'm going to try to fix it.
- Alright, I kind of fixed it... --Megaman 22:14, 11 October 2010 (PDT)
background
history of logs: uh, i misplaced them? no seriously. Clydec 19:16, 11 October 2010 (PDT)
"misplaced", wut.--Hans Gruber 15:38, 12 October 2010 (PDT)
i have like 4 computers shut up, i am an AI and i need these to live. Clydec 15:39, 12 October 2010 (PDT)
Summaries
Do we want short summaries at the top of the pages? Many of these conversations are long... RachmaninovDESU 10:03, 13 October 2010 (PDT)
- Good thinking there, partner. Let's fund it. --Champthom 10:22, 13 October 2010 (PDT)
- I've tried to do some summaries/synopses for the first three chats. I realize they might be too long, in which case someone can edit them. --KataclysmKat 1:50, 05 February 2011