Difference between revisions of "Talk:/cow/"
m |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[http://krapplekomputerkompany.com/README This is all that's left of /cwc/] What happened? --[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 07:21, 2 November 2009 (CET) | [http://krapplekomputerkompany.com/README This is all that's left of /cwc/] What happened? --[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 07:21, 2 November 2009 (CET) | ||
Dear god... DEAR GOD, heres to hoping that this is a trick to fool the spammer into leaving. | |||
Revision as of 01:23, 2 November 2009
Krapple guy suggested that there be a new article and frankly, I agree with him. Ideally let's keep namefaggotry out of this, as Krapple is now an established part of the CWC troll scene (consider the fact that the first reference to Ivy was on Krapple, and Ivy's first appearance was on Krapple as well, not to mention Clyde frequents the place). Really though, let's not make this a giant plug like the old article was about.
IMHO, this should strictly stick to what the site is about, and notable stuff that has happened on the board (read: first mention of Ivy, leaks, etc.). --Champthom 12:29, 9 May 2009 (CEST)
- Should CEO & the *chan /cwc/ is hosted on have a slight mention as well? --Anonymous 14:42, 9 May 2009 (CEST)
- Don't push it, nigger. ^^ But I agree this needs an article, it shouldn't really have been deleted in the first place. /cwc/ has delivered OC, and they are great when 110 is down. Also, krapple si a pretty cool guy. RachmaninovDESU 23:27, 9 May 2009 (CEST)
Date
Are we sure that it was opened on the 28th? It may just be my time zone (some websites compensate for them, I'm not sure if this is one of them), but the first new topic is dated for the 27th. --LizardPie 17:55, 28 August 2009 (CEST)
- I made that edit so I could be wrong. By all means fix it. --Champthom 17:58, 28 August 2009 (CEST)
Deleted Forever?
This is all that's left of /cwc/ What happened? --Blazer 07:21, 2 November 2009 (CET)
Dear god... DEAR GOD, heres to hoping that this is a trick to fool the spammer into leaving.