Difference between revisions of "Talk:IRC (26 October 2008)"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (3 revisions)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Renaming==
==Renaming==
Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of [[IRC (26 October 2008)]]? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)
Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of [[IRC (26 October 2008)]]? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)
:Definitely--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 16:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:27, 1 June 2010

Excellent work here. --Champthom 04:55, 11 February 2009 (CET)

Renaming

Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of IRC (26 October 2008)? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --Champthom 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)

Definitely--Beat 16:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)