Difference between revisions of "Talk:DeviantART"
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Not that I want to see the pic or anything if it ''is'' child porn (which disgusts me). However, I would like to know more about this "washing-machine pic," whether or not Cheguevaraplz was right about it/lying/whatever, and (most importantly) whether or not this means that perhaps Chris ''is'' a pedofork after all. --[[User:Spandam-sama|Spandam-sama]] 00:35, 29 August 2009 (CEST) | Not that I want to see the pic or anything if it ''is'' child porn (which disgusts me). However, I would like to know more about this "washing-machine pic," whether or not Cheguevaraplz was right about it/lying/whatever, and (most importantly) whether or not this means that perhaps Chris ''is'' a pedofork after all. --[[User:Spandam-sama|Spandam-sama]] 00:35, 29 August 2009 (CEST) | ||
* The [http://cogsdev.110mb.com/cwcipedia/index.php/Image:SchuComic9P35.jpg Pantyshot]...I don't think the pantyshot is enough to get him banned, but with my understanding of DA's sometimes arcane policies (and observations as a long time Deviantartfag myself), the facerape would DEFINITELY get him banhammered. Plus, probably twenty people reported him. -- [[User:Needlepants|Needlepants]] 00:40, 29 August 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 28 August 2009
A pedofork drawing?
I didn't get to see CWC's dA soon enough, and am wondering about the pic that Chris was banned for. The poster of this comment leads me to believe that it was some sort of Rosey pantyshot, but the main article calls it the Rosechu washing-machine (maybe facerape?) pic. (If it was the facerape, Rosechu was 18, so it wouldn't have been child porn, although . If it wasn't facerape, then I'd like a better description of the pic.)
Not that I want to see the pic or anything if it is child porn (which disgusts me). However, I would like to know more about this "washing-machine pic," whether or not Cheguevaraplz was right about it/lying/whatever, and (most importantly) whether or not this means that perhaps Chris is a pedofork after all. --Spandam-sama 00:35, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
- The Pantyshot...I don't think the pantyshot is enough to get him banned, but with my understanding of DA's sometimes arcane policies (and observations as a long time Deviantartfag myself), the facerape would DEFINITELY get him banhammered. Plus, probably twenty people reported him. -- Needlepants 00:40, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
