Difference between revisions of "Help talk:A Guide to Piping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'This is really great. Also, Pretty much the only time Piping to Wikipedia is appropriate is to deal with mentions of celebrities or franchises that have no place on the CWCki. …') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is really great. Also, Pretty much the only time Piping to Wikipedia is appropriate is to deal with mentions of celebrities or franchises that have no place on the CWCki. The best example of this is in the mailbags, where everybody and his brother is writing as a serial murder, dead politician or actor with violence issues.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 04:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | This is really great. Also, Pretty much the only time Piping to Wikipedia is appropriate is to deal with mentions of celebrities or franchises that have no place on the CWCki. The best example of this is in the mailbags, where everybody and his brother is writing as a serial murder, dead politician or actor with violence issues.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 04:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I would say that piping to Wikipedia is also warranted for technical jargon; I've piped to the Wikipedia article for magical thinking and psychological fantasy, for instance. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus|Revolver Octopus]] 01:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:51, 28 February 2010
This is really great. Also, Pretty much the only time Piping to Wikipedia is appropriate is to deal with mentions of celebrities or franchises that have no place on the CWCki. The best example of this is in the mailbags, where everybody and his brother is writing as a serial murder, dead politician or actor with violence issues.--Beat 04:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would say that piping to Wikipedia is also warranted for technical jargon; I've piped to the Wikipedia article for magical thinking and psychological fantasy, for instance. -- Revolver Octopus 01:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)