Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedo-Glasses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --[[User:Sonijew|Sonijew]] 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET) | :Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --[[User:Sonijew|Sonijew]] 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET) | ||
:Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.[[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET) | :Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.[[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET) | ||
::They fail to make him not look like a pedo. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 03:25, 17 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 22:25, 16 December 2009
I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo
I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.
- GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. Jump 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)
Of Fail
Someone needs to move this page to Pedo-Glasses of Fail. –Ich bin schwul, Lynxr. Ich bin schwul.– 01:02, 17 December 2009 (CET)
- Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --Sonijew 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
- Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.Griffintown 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET)
- They fail to make him not look like a pedo. --CWCAttack 03:25, 17 December 2009 (CET)