Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sydney Kirsch"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc? | I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc? | ||
*Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | *Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. [[User:Fefnir|Fefnir]] 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
*One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:15, 14 May 2010
Article Name?
What do we think about the current article name? Can anyone think of a better one? --Ronichu 01:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I say Sydney Kirsch would be an appropriate name. --User:Shearod 0:12, 13 May 2010 (CST)
- Champthom mentioned this. He noted that most troll name pages (such as Vanessa) tend to be about the troll, while the other information goes under a saga page. Sydney was far, far too short, private and fail to be a saga IMHO. Yet her personality is very unrelated to Chris and therefore shouldn't be awarded its own page (AKA Matthew Devoria). Sydney can be summed up in a few sentences. Yet, there are phone calls as well as emails, so it's not clear cut. I considered 'Sydney Trolling Effort', 'Sydney Trolling Fail' and a few others. This was the most neutral I could think of. --Ronichu 07:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this definitely can't count as a saga. Way to short, and nothing noteworthy came out of it. At best, it's a crank call. It was a noble attempt, but it seems even Chris has gotten tired of his sweetheart search... We either need to bring liquid out of retirement or have Alec raise the stakes by taking control of sonichu. Once they best him, the depression should drive him back into his ill-fated sweetheart search --SargentPickles 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree and said as much. It's not a saga. It's a little more detailed than a prank call, given the leadup, but... Hmm. I'm still inclined to go with it's current name, although it still doesn't seem right to me. Beat is perfect, maybe he can provide a name. --Ronichu 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this definitely can't count as a saga. Way to short, and nothing noteworthy came out of it. At best, it's a crank call. It was a noble attempt, but it seems even Chris has gotten tired of his sweetheart search... We either need to bring liquid out of retirement or have Alec raise the stakes by taking control of sonichu. Once they best him, the depression should drive him back into his ill-fated sweetheart search --SargentPickles 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
I agree, Sydney Kirsch is fine. On a side note, Chris mentions he has access to pvcc?
- Well, it could be that or EDF, or somewhere else, but Chris didn't specify which forum he got the info from. Fefnir 05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- One, sign your fucking posts. Two, he has no access to PVCC. He reads EDF and checks the front page of the CWCki every now and then. That's it. Three, reverse my username.--MoarLurk 06:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)