Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Chris and"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Guidelines: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:These are excellent guidelines. That said your sig doesn't include your name so I have no idea who you are.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 22 May 2010
We need "Chris and Reliability" --CJB8895
- I'm sure that, if we asked him, he'd agree to make it for us later. --Tristran 02:46, 9 December 2009 (CET)
Guidelines
I've tried to add some guidelines about how to go about writing a "Chris and..." article. Whether people will find and read it before attempting to create ill-conceived new ones - is another matter. As always, feel free to correct my take on what the Chris and... series is for, as I was purely writing from what I understand of it. --18:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- These are excellent guidelines. That said your sig doesn't include your name so I have no idea who you are.--Beat 18:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)