Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ian Brandon Anderson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Isnt cwcki more of a documentation of chris's life rather then satirical like ED? would it not make sense then to eliminate all references of chris as Ian, even here, and here instead just explain why people started using the name IBA? I also dislike it as its confusing and basically taking limel;ight off of chris and celebrating the trolls, chris trolls himself mostly --[[User:Bentduck|Bentduck]] 12:14, 10 August 2010 (PDT) | Isnt cwcki more of a documentation of chris's life rather then satirical like ED? would it not make sense then to eliminate all references of chris as Ian, even here, and here instead just explain why people started using the name IBA? I also dislike it as its confusing and basically taking limel;ight off of chris and celebrating the trolls, chris trolls himself mostly --[[User:Bentduck|Bentduck]] 12:14, 10 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
: True, it is pretty confusing. I support this. --[[User:GandWuser|GandWuser]] 12:24, 10 August 2010 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:24, 10 August 2010
We need a plausible theory of when Chris became CChanSonichuCWC (as in explaining the weight differences, that sort of thing). --Champthom 02:43, 16 August 2009 (CEST)
Isnt cwcki more of a documentation of chris's life rather then satirical like ED? would it not make sense then to eliminate all references of chris as Ian, even here, and here instead just explain why people started using the name IBA? I also dislike it as its confusing and basically taking limel;ight off of chris and celebrating the trolls, chris trolls himself mostly --Bentduck 12:14, 10 August 2010 (PDT)
- True, it is pretty confusing. I support this. --GandWuser 12:24, 10 August 2010 (PDT)