Difference between revisions of "User talk:SurfShackTito"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Never say die) |
m (~~~~ bot? In my CWCki?) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Thank you for the many laughs!--[[User:Demendred|Demendred]] 21:11 17 June 2011 (PST) | Thank you for the many laughs!--[[User:Demendred|Demendred]] 21:11 17 June 2011 (PST) | ||
:What is this, RIP? Tito isn't past-tense, silly. | :What is this, RIP? Tito isn't past-tense, silly.[[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 22:03, 17 June 2011 (PDT) |
Revision as of 00:03, 18 June 2011
In case your too lazy to reply on my talkpage.
I want to make sure your the real Tito, Chris may fall for stupid shit, but I am not. Omegaforce 04:54, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- I hate to tell you, but even Chris knows he can't grief the articles without it being reverted back to original state in seconds faster than you can blank page them. I would go as far to say he's just a cunt hair smarter than you. & Where is your email you claim to have? I know for a fact you never reached him. Most likely you will recycle mannerisms in most of his emails. But still, even I want a good laugh. Present the email here, boy.
- First, prove to me you are the actual Tito. Omegaforce 14:21, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- Tito isn't the one who has to prove anything, you are. Stop being so obstructive and start talking. You're dragging this on far longer than it needs to. If you're not willing to start talking, just go away. Whatever you have to say can be said here - you're just being stupid in requesting identify verification on a Wiki. --Anonymax 14:52, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- The fuck? Are you wanting a Birth Certificate based on a fictional character from a canceled Nicktoons show? You really are alot more dumb than Chris. Only way i can prove to you I'm him is my work and thats it. I already know from the start whatever you're going to give me or clyde will be absolute bullshit anyway, at this point I'm just wanting something humorous to read, even if it is fake. SurfShackTito 15:09, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- Tito isn't the one who has to prove anything, you are. Stop being so obstructive and start talking. You're dragging this on far longer than it needs to. If you're not willing to start talking, just go away. Whatever you have to say can be said here - you're just being stupid in requesting identify verification on a Wiki. --Anonymax 14:52, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- First, prove to me you are the actual Tito. Omegaforce 14:21, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
he already posted some emails on the cwcki, they were deleted --Cogsdev 15:49, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- Well shit, must've missed out, anyways, you suck either way, omega. And if it's Chris you're wanting to reach, I don't think blank paging articles is helping you cause, brudda. SurfShackTito 16:17, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- Show them the e-mails faggot. I can fucking kick you in the fucking asshole you fucking piece of fucking dog shit. Now fucking prove to me that you are fucking Tito you fucking piece of shit. I have a army of men ready to devour this shitty wiki, now CALLZ ME. Omegaforce 16:44, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- FUCKING COUNT: 7. NEW RECORD !! Clydec 17:05, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
- You Mad? SurfShackTito 17:04, 7 September 2010 (PDT)
You are my favorite troll
Thank you for the many laughs!--Demendred 21:11 17 June 2011 (PST)
- What is this, RIP? Tito isn't past-tense, silly.Nullity 22:03, 17 June 2011 (PDT)