Difference between revisions of "File talk:Kacey2.jpg"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Not cool. This woman was willing to go and meet Chris personally in order to gather information about him and provide us with lulz. Shit like that (presuming this is a real picture of Kacey to begin with) could be discouraging to future trolls. Why should anyone try to go on fake dates with Chris again if it's very likely she'll be doxed on the CWCki? I say we delete this. - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 11:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Not cool. This woman was willing to go and meet Chris personally in order to gather information about him and provide us with lulz. Shit like that (presuming this is a real picture of Kacey to begin with) could be discouraging to future trolls. Why should anyone try to go on fake dates with Chris again if it's very likely she'll be doxed on the CWCki? I say we delete this. - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 11:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
:it's a picture of how Chris knew her. It's not her real name or personal information. Also this info is pretty well known, how she looks isn't a secret.--[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 16:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
:it's a picture of how Chris knew her. It's not her real name or personal information. Also this info is pretty well known, how she looks isn't a secret.--[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 16:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
:Dare I point out the implied double-standard here with the picture of Fatass here compared to the picture of Megan elsewhere? Plus she at different points had been discussed by name on the forums and anyone with a good memory could share the information or look deeper and share ''that'' info with people. As for the fake date thing, why the fuck would anyone (or rather, how could they) go on an outing with him at this point anyway? Point is, this picture being on here is largely harmless and probably won't do her much damage because she's largely remembered by most who interacted with her as a twat and annoying by many spectators (so not much more to be done, basically), resulting in people not really caring about her outside the context of Chris trolling. [[User:Zero|Zero]] ([[User talk:Zero|talk]]) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
::also even if she did find out it was up here she'd probably shit herself and do nothing, just saiyan [[User:Zero|Zero]] ([[User talk:Zero|talk]]) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:30, 10 May 2014

Not cool. This woman was willing to go and meet Chris personally in order to gather information about him and provide us with lulz. Shit like that (presuming this is a real picture of Kacey to begin with) could be discouraging to future trolls. Why should anyone try to go on fake dates with Chris again if it's very likely she'll be doxed on the CWCki? I say we delete this. - NegaCWC (talk) 11:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

it's a picture of how Chris knew her. It's not her real name or personal information. Also this info is pretty well known, how she looks isn't a secret.--Samwell (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Dare I point out the implied double-standard here with the picture of Fatass here compared to the picture of Megan elsewhere? Plus she at different points had been discussed by name on the forums and anyone with a good memory could share the information or look deeper and share that info with people. As for the fake date thing, why the fuck would anyone (or rather, how could they) go on an outing with him at this point anyway? Point is, this picture being on here is largely harmless and probably won't do her much damage because she's largely remembered by most who interacted with her as a twat and annoying by many spectators (so not much more to be done, basically), resulting in people not really caring about her outside the context of Chris trolling. Zero (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
also even if she did find out it was up here she'd probably shit herself and do nothing, just saiyan Zero (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)