Difference between revisions of "Talk:Original Sonichu and Rosechu Drawing"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Actual profit?: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:


He said, all not signing his post. But yeah, before the bidding jumped to $10,000, I was actually considering putting down no more than $250 for it. [[User:Dick Banton|Dick Banton]] ([[User talk:Dick Banton|talk]]) 18:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
He said, all not signing his post. But yeah, before the bidding jumped to $10,000, I was actually considering putting down no more than $250 for it. [[User:Dick Banton|Dick Banton]] ([[User talk:Dick Banton|talk]]) 18:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
== Actual profit? ==
What's sad is, if Chris wasn't a total egotist and just listed his artwork for, say, reasonable prices of like 10-20 bucks, swarms upon swarms of trolls would eat them up like crazy. And, I doubt both the material and "time" needed to create such artwork would be negligible to the profit margin and Chris could actually probably get a lot of money doing that. But, no, he's an egotistical retard, who only things "AS QUICK WITH AS LITTLE EFFORT AS POSSIBLE". He should be counting his lucky stars with the fact he can get ANY money at all for this godawful level of artwork, that couldn't be given away if it wasn't for his reputation.
That being said, I hope no one ever pays him for it, let alone gives him money. His whole crying remark of "MY MOTHER AND I REALLY NEED THE MONEY" is pissing me off; he, and everyone else, knows damn well he just wants to buy some severely overpriced Legos. What a waste of life. --[[User:The World Is Yours|The World Is Yours]] ([[User talk:The World Is Yours|talk]]) 23:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:22, 17 June 2014

You know, people could buy it, then use it as fire wood, but nah, they are just ripping chris off, which is good way to troll but not the best.--Zimkiller1 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

What if...

Let's just say for the sake of argument that someone legitimately gave Chris a grand for this 8 1/2" x 11" piece, would they become a legend to trolls or someone to laugh at for pissing their money away on a piece of epic fail? Hunters108 12:18, 16 June 2014‎

He said, all not signing his post. But yeah, before the bidding jumped to $10,000, I was actually considering putting down no more than $250 for it. Dick Banton (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Actual profit?

What's sad is, if Chris wasn't a total egotist and just listed his artwork for, say, reasonable prices of like 10-20 bucks, swarms upon swarms of trolls would eat them up like crazy. And, I doubt both the material and "time" needed to create such artwork would be negligible to the profit margin and Chris could actually probably get a lot of money doing that. But, no, he's an egotistical retard, who only things "AS QUICK WITH AS LITTLE EFFORT AS POSSIBLE". He should be counting his lucky stars with the fact he can get ANY money at all for this godawful level of artwork, that couldn't be given away if it wasn't for his reputation.

That being said, I hope no one ever pays him for it, let alone gives him money. His whole crying remark of "MY MOTHER AND I REALLY NEED THE MONEY" is pissing me off; he, and everyone else, knows damn well he just wants to buy some severely overpriced Legos. What a waste of life. --The World Is Yours (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)