Difference between revisions of "File talk:Sega's Reponse.png"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I'm studying business law.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I second that. Chandler is our problem and ours alone. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 03:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | * I second that. Chandler is our problem and ours alone. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 03:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
**It's just a cost-benefit decision. A company will usually take no action unless it means a material gain or loss. If a single lawyer works a single hour researching Chris on company time, it's already cost Sega more money than they'll ever make by suing him.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 03:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | **It's just a cost-benefit decision. A company will usually take no action unless it means a material gain or loss. If a single lawyer works a single hour researching Chris on company time, it's already cost Sega more money than they'll ever make by suing him.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 03:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*It probably won't pan out to anything but it will have given a team of junior researchers an enjoyable afternoon. --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 04:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:41, 27 January 2010
That's pretty cool, but I'm willing to bet the legal team decided to just plain not care.--Beat 02:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- I second that. Chandler is our problem and ours alone. --CWCAttack 03:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's just a cost-benefit decision. A company will usually take no action unless it means a material gain or loss. If a single lawyer works a single hour researching Chris on company time, it's already cost Sega more money than they'll ever make by suing him.--Beat 03:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- It probably won't pan out to anything but it will have given a team of junior researchers an enjoyable afternoon. --Delabonte 04:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
